Pakistan Case Law
2004 PCRLJ 1878

SHAHID JAMEEL Versus SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, FAISALABAD

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2004 PCRLJ 1878
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petition No.2630 of 2004
Date2004-05-31
Judge(s)Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Ch. Iftikhar Hussain
Authored byAsif Saeed Khan Khosa
ResultWrit Petition accepted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This writ petition challenged an order passed by the Anti-Terrorism Court, Faisalabad, which dismissed the petitioner's application for the transfer of criminal cases to a court of ordinary jurisdiction. The petitioner was charged with offences under the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 and the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 regarding dacoity and murder. The core legal question was whether the alleged offences, committed for private gain, constituted 'terrorism' under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, thereby falling within the jurisdiction of the Special Court. The Court held that the offences lacked the specific 'design' or 'purpose' (mens rea) required by Section 6(1)(b) or (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 to qualify as terrorism. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order, accepted the transfer application, and directed the cases to be transferred to a court of ordinary jurisdiction. The key principle laid down is that acts committed solely for private gain without the requisite mens rea specified in the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 do not constitute terrorism and are not triable by a Special Court.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does a dacoity committed for private gain constitute an act of terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997?
  • Does a Special Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 have jurisdiction to try cases where the requisite mens rea for terrorism is missing?
  • Can a case be transferred from an Anti-Terrorism Court to a court of ordinary jurisdiction if the offence does not fall within the scope of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 395, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 396, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 412, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 7, Anti-Terrorism Act 1997
  • Section 23, Anti-Terrorism Act 1997
  • Section 6(1)(b), Anti-Terrorism Act 1997
  • Section 6(1)(c), Anti-Terrorism Act 1997
Anti-Terrorism Actjurisdiction of Special Courtmens readacoitytransfer of criminal casesterrorism

ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J .--- The petitioner is an accused person in case F.I.R. No. 413 registered at Police Station Jhang Bazar, Faisalabad on 31-8-2003 for offences under sections 302/395/396, P.P.C. and section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. The petitioner is also an accused person in the connected case F.I.R. No.734 registered at Police Station Peoples Colony, Faisalabad on 7-9-2003 for an offence under section 412, P.P.C. Both the said connected criminal cases are presently being tried by the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court, Faisalabad. An application had been submitted by the petitioner before the learned Judge. Anti-Terrorism Court, Faisalabad under section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 seeking transfer of the said criminal cases to a Court of ordinary jurisdiction but that application of the petitioner was dismissed by the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism. Court, Faisalabad vide order, dated 11-11-2003. Hence the present writ petition before this Court.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the relevant record of the above mentioned criminal cases appended with this petition. A bare perusal of the F.I.Rs. registered in the above mentioned criminal cases shows that the said cases pertained to a dacoity with murders committed only for the purpose of private gains and regarding retention of stolen property. Apparently the offences in question had not been committed with the `design' or the `purpose' contemplated by the provisions of section 6(1)(b) or (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. It has already been held by this Court in the case of Basharat Ali v. Special Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court-II Gujranwala PLD 2004 Lah. 199 (DB) that if the actus reus of an accused person is not committed with the mens rea specified in section 6(1)(b) or (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 then a Special Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 has no jurisdiction to try such a case. The requisite mens rea is clearly missing in the above mentioned criminal cases so as to brand the acts attributed to the petitioner arid his co- accused as `terrorism'. This writ petition is, therefore, allowed, the impugned order passed by the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court, Faisalabad on 11-11-2003 is set aside, the application submitted by the petitioner under section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 before the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court, Faisalabad is accepted and it is declared that the above mentioned criminal cases against the petitioner and his co-accused are triable by a Court of ordinary jurisdiction. The learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court, Faisalabad is directed to transmit the record of the above mentioned criminal cases to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Faisalabad forthwith for further proceedings in the matter according to the law. There shall be no order as to costs.

H.B.T./S-206/L Writ Petition accepted.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.