Pakistan Case Law
2004 PCRLJ 652

ABDUL RASHEED Versus THE STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2004 PCRLJ 652
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petition No.5921‑Q of 2000/BWP
Date2002-01-18
Judge(s)Tanvir Bashir Ansari
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter comes before the Lahore High Court upon a petition seeking the quashment of an F.I.R. registered under section 16 of the M.P.O. 1960. The core legal question raised is whether an F.I.R. for a non-cognizable offence can be registered and investigated without the prior permission of a Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. The court holds that because the offence is non-cognizable and the complaint was registered without the mandatory prior permission of the Magistrate, the proceedings are incompetent. Consequently, the court decides to quash the F.I.R. The key principle laid down is that the registration and investigation of a non-cognizable offence without obtaining prior permission from a Magistrate as required by law renders the F.I.R. incompetent and liable to be quashed.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can an F.I.R. for a non-cognizable offence be registered without the prior permission of a Magistrate?
  • Whether investigation can take place for a non-cognizable offence without complying with sections 155 and 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
  • Is an F.I.R. registered without the prior permission of the Magistrate liable to be quashed?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 16, M.P.O. 1960
  • Section 155, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
  • Section 156, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
quashment of FIRnon-cognizable offenceprior permission of Magistratecriminal procedurecompetency of complaint

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that F.I.R. No.427 of 2000 registered under section 16 of M.P.O. 1960 is not competent, as the offence is a non‑cognizable offence and it cannot be registered and no investigation thereupon can take place without the prior permission of the Magistrate as provided by sections 155 and 156, Cr.P.C.

2. Learned A.A.‑G. concedes that the complaint has been registered upon the complaint of Muhammad Rizwan Malik without the prior, permission of the Magistrate. In this view of the matter as the complaint has not been competently filed the F.I.R. No.427 of 2000 is directed to be quashed.

N.H.Q./A‑18/L F.I.R. quashed.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.