MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Versus STATE
ORDER
1. Learned Assistant Advocate‑General has no objection, in view of S. 164, Cr. P. C, statement of Mst. Shadoo, which prima‑facie, shows, that she was a willing party and furthermore according to the medical certificate, her age is said to be 17 years. Keeping in view .the above statement of the learned Assistant Advocate‑General and the fact, that Mst. Shadoo is A 17 years old and she in her statement under section 164, Cr. P. C. prim facie gives an impression, that she was a willing party, in my opinion, tho case against the applicant would require further inquiry at the stage of~ trial. Accordingly, I allow the above application and direct that the applicant be released on bail, on his furnishing surety in the sum o? Rs. 20,000 (Twenty Thousand), with P R bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
2. Bail granted.
Cited by 1 case
- MUHAMMAD HAYAT vs THE STATE 1983 P Cr. L J 1359