Pakistan Case Law
1994 PCRLJ 1772

WADERO GHULAM HYDER Versus STATE

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation1994 PCRLJ 1772
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No.7 of 1994
Date1994-01-04
Judge(s)Imam Ali G, Kazi

ORDER

1. The four applicants are present is Court today with their Advocate Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo. He contends that the applicants are accused of offences under section 353, 332, 342, 147, 149, 504 and 186, P.P.C. All these offences are bailable. In spite of the offences being bailable the applicants) apprehend that they will be arrested by Jhirak Police.

2. Mr. Habib Rasheed, Advocate appearing for the Advocate-General, Sindh, agrees to the contentions advanced by Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo, B Advocate for the applicants, and records his no objection to the grant of bail.

3. The applicants shall not be arrested by police in the investigation of Crime No.42 of 1993 registered at Police Station Jhirak, District Thatta, on their furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) each and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Nazir of this Court.

4. If at any time the prosecution considers that there is some evidence implicating the applicants in some non-bailable offences, they can move the trial Court for cancellation of their bail.

5. N.H.Q./G-370/K Pre-arrest bail granted.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.