SAMIUDDIN REHMANI ALIAS TINNO Versus THE STATE

ORDER

1. This is a reference made by the learned Special Judge-I (S.T.A.), Karachi, in which he has pointed out that accused Samiuddin Rehmani who was granted bail by this Court had furnished the required surety before the Sessions Judge (Central), Karachi but after the transfer of the case to the Court of Special Judge-I (S.T.A.), Karachi the accused has not furnished surety. He, therefore, made a reference to consider the question of cancellation of bail granted to the accused, who seemingly misused the said concession.

2. I have heard Mr. Muniruddin Alvi, learned Advocate for the applicant/accused and his grievance is that the surety documents were submitted in the Court of Sessions Judge (Central), Karachi, but on transfer of the case to the Special Court, the surety documents have not been sent to the said Court, nor the same are being delivered to the surety.

3. In the circumstances, it is directed that the learned Sessions Judge (Central), Karachi shall send the surety documents furnished by Mst. Ishrat Rehmani through his clerk to the Court of Special Judge (S.T.A.), Karachi 8 where the case is fixed, as stated, on 14-2-1994. The learned Special Judge shall scrutinize the documents and if the same are found adequate may accept the same. The reference stands disposed of.

4. N.H.Q./S-1084/K Order accordingly.