SHALIMAR FILTER INDUSTRIES Versus JARAR MUSTA.A BOKHARI
ORDER
1. HAZIQUL KHAIRI, J .--- It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that assembly of five armed persons by itself would not constitute preparation for dacoity and, therefore, it is a case which requires further inquiry. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the applicant had placed reliance on 1990 P Cr. L J 41; A I R 1960 Ph. 452; A I R 1940 Ph. 456; A A I R 1952 Pb. 249 and 1989 P Cr. L J 2314. It is also candidly conceded by the learned Additional Advocate-General that it is a case of further inquiry. We accordingly order that the applicant may be enlarged on bail upon furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
2. N.H.Q./A-1424/K Bail allowed
Cited by 9 cases
- ALI KHAN and others vs THE STATE 2009 YLR 596
- RAHAT SHAH and 3 others vs THE STATE 2002 P Cr. L J 1309
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF alias KALI and 2 others vs THE STATE 1998 P Cr. L J 1120
- JAMALUDDIN And Another vs THE STATE 1995 MLD 1779
- KHAWAR and others vs THE STATE 1995 PLD Karachi 105
- IRFANULLAH vs THE STATE 1995 P Cr. L J 1329
- MUBIN ALI SIDDIQUI Alias HAMAYUN vs THE STATE 1997 MLD 2479
- MUHAMMAD ILYAS Versus THE STATE 2000 YLR 1335
- WAZIR Versus THE STATE 2003 MLD 1990