MUHAMMAD HASIL Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

ORDER

1. The petitioner seeks review of my order on the ground that the rule laid down in the case of Pakistan Television Corporation v. Babar Zaman (1981 P L C 219) has been omitted from consideration. I am afraid, the facts of that case do not relate to the facts of the present case. The petitioner is a road Inspector and in my view he is a civil servant. The learned counsel has, however, argued that the petitioner has no remedy before the Service Tribunal as the period of limitation provided for the appeal before the Service Tribunal has expired. This, however, is no ground for allowing a writ petition and thus conferring a jurisdiction or the Labour Court which otherwise does not vest in them. The petition is dismissed.

2. A. B. Petition dismissed