NOOR ELAHI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
This matter concerns a petition filed by a Head Clerk in the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) challenging an adverse Annual Confidential Report (ACR) recorded in 1991. The petitioner, having served for thirty-one years, contended that the adverse report was biased, as it was authored by a Reporting Officer under whom he served for only one year and who allegedly harbored a grievance against him. Furthermore, the petitioner argued that the communication of this adverse ACR was delayed by nearly four years, occurring only on August 15, 1994, which constituted a procedural violation of the specific instructions governing Confidential Reports for PAF Civilians. The core legal question before the Court was whether an adverse ACR communicated with significant, unexplained delay and allegedly motivated by personal bias should be expunged. Upon considering the petitioner's submissions regarding the procedural irregularities and the questionable circumstances of the report's issuance, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to examine the validity of the adverse ACR and the potential violation of the governing administrative instructions.
- Does a significant delay in communicating an adverse Annual Confidential Report to a civil servant constitute a violation of administrative procedure?
- Can an adverse Annual Confidential Report be challenged on the grounds of personal bias by the Reporting Officer?
- Are the instructions contained in the Confidential Reports for PAF Civilians mandatory for the validity of an adverse report?
- Paragraph 15, Confidential Reports, PAF Civilians
- Paragraph 16-C, Confidential Reports, PAF Civilians
- Paragraph 19, Confidential Reports, PAF Civilians
ORDER
1. It is submitted by the petitioner that he is Head Clerk in P.A.F., Sargodha, and has served for thirty‑one years but has earned only one adverse Annual Confidential Report in 1991 which was given to him by Reporting Officer, Flight Lieutenant Asim Malik, under whom he served only for one year and who had grievance against him. It is further .submitted that this adverse A.C.R. of 1991 was communicated to him after a delay of nearly four years on 15‑8‑1994 which was done in violation of paragraphs 15, 16‑C and 19 of Confidential Reports, PAF Civilians. It is contended that in the circumstances the said A.C.R. is liable to be expunged. Leave is granted to consider the contention stated above.
2. A.A./M‑472/S Leave granted