Pakistan Case Law
2002 PLC(CS) 814

Haji KHAN LASHARI Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation2002 PLC(CS) 814
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions Nos. 575 to 685 and 697 to 701โ€‘K of 2000
Judge(s)Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Hamid Ali Mirza
Authored byNazim Hussain Siddiqui
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, J.โ€‘โ€‘โ€‘ This order will dispose of petitions Nos.575 to 685 and 697 to 701โ€‘K of 2000 as, common questions are involved in these matters.

2. The petitioners were employees of Pakistan Steel Mills and their services, en bloc, were terminated on 1โ€‘2โ€‘2000. They approached Management of the respondents and a Review Committee was constituted, which gave them interim relief in the way that they were allowed ad hoc salaries up to May, 2000. Thereafter, they approached Federal Service Tribunal for redress of their grievance. The Tribunal admitted their appeals, but declined any interim relief and fixed the matter for hearing on 16โ€‘4โ€‘2.000, which date later on was changed to 18โ€‘1โ€‘2001. Against above order, the petitioners have approached this Court.

3. It is pertinent to point out here that in a similar petition (C.P.L.C. No. 427โ€‘K of 2000) this Court, by consent, had passed an order whereby interim relief was granted to petitioner Pasha Ahmed Gul, with regard to payment of ad hoc salary and the petition was disposed of in terms thereof.

4. The petitioners contend that similar relief be allowed to them as was given to said Pasha Ahmed Gul. Learned counsel for the respondents has vehemently opposed above plea and stated that the prosecution are not willing to extend said concession to the petitioners and that even the respondents have filed a review petition for withdrawal of said order. It was a consent order and since the respondents are not willing to consent in these petitions, the relief given to said Pasha Ahmed Gul cannot be given to these petitions. Order It is lying with the respondents and they are entitled td receive said dues, to completion of legal formalities, rights, they will be entitled to drawback their final dues from the respondents who shall pay the same to them as early as possible.

5. The appeals of the petitioners are already fixed before Federal Service Tribunal on 18th January, 2001, which may be disposed of on that particular date or on subsequent ate not later than three weeks thereafter. In above terms, the petitions stand disposed of.

6. Q. M. H. /M. A. K./Kโ€‘46/S Order accordingly.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.