Pakistan Case Law
2004 PLC(CS) 792

MUHAMMAD RASHEED, STENOGRAPHER Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION Muhammad Zaman Bhatti

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2004 PLC(CS) 792
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1231 to 1242 of 2003
Judge(s)Syed Deedar Hussain Shah and Falak Sher
Authored bySyed Deedar Hussain Shah
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

SYED DEEDAR HUSSAIN SHAH, J .‑‑‑By this common order we propose to dispose of Civil Petitions Nos.1231 to 1242 of 2003, which are directed against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal Islamabad (hereinafter referred to as, the Tribunal) dated. 20‑3‑2003, passed in Appeals Nos.69(R)CS to 80(R)CS of 2002.

2. Mr. Muhammad Zaman Bhatti, learned Advocate Supreme Court, inter alia, contended that the learned Tribunal has not granted equitable relief to the petitioners and they have been discriminated, because in the same facts and circumstances the employees of the Monopoly Control Authority (MCA) have been allowed the benefits of pension and G.P. Fund etc. He also pointed out that the employees of National Police Academy (NPA) as well as Frontier Works Organization (FWO) have been allowed the benefits of pension under the order of this Court dated 21‑1‑20.03. He further submitted that the Tribunal vide judgment dated 2‑4‑1999 held that the National Tariff Commission (NTC) was an attached department of the Ministry of Commerce and that it was not a corporate body; that the aforesaid findings of the Tribunal were not challenged before appellate forum, which attained finality and the Tribunal‑ in the judgment impugned herein did not agree with the interpretation of the law made by the Tribunal .in its judgment dated 2‑4‑1999. In support of his contentions learned counsel has referred to Divisional Superintendent, P.W. R. Karachi v. Bashir Ahmed PLD 1973 SC 589; Ahmad Khan v. Secretary to Government 1997 SCMR 1477‑and Secretary, Railways Board v. Muhammad Zubair Rana PLD 2000 SC 61.

3. We have considered .the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioners and minutely perused the material available as well as the case‑law. Prima facie the points raised by the learned counsel require consideration, therefore, leave to appeal is granted in all the above mentioned petitions.

S.A.K./M‑15/S Leave granted.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.