WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus ALLAH DAD MASHORI Mazhar Ali B. Chohan , Manzoor Ali Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Miss Wajahat Niaz

ORDER

Although Mr. Mazhar Alin Chohan, learned Advocate-on-Record for petitioner is in attendance Mr. Muhammad Siddiq Mirza, learned Advocate Supreme Court for the petitioner has submitted identical applications for adjournment on the ground that on account of his engagement before the Principal Seat of this Court at Islamabad, he is unable to appear.

2. Messrs Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, and Manzoor Ali Khan, learned Advocates Supreme Court have entered appearance on caveat on behalf of respondents in C.Ps. Nos.1051-K, 1053-K and 1055-K of 2002 and C.Ps. Nos.1056-K and 1057-K of 2002 respectively while in C.Ps. Nos.1052-K and 1054-K of 2002 respondents are present in person.

3. Respondents have a genuine grievance that the petitioner-WAPDA after illegal termination of the employment of the respondents, struck down by the Federal Service Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) vide judgment, dated 10-9-2002, has not bothered to implement the reinstatement orders. Before proceeding further with the hearing of the petitions, authorities of. the petitioner-WAPDA are required to implement the judgment of the Tribunal in its true spirit, as no irreparable loss is likely to be caused to the Management by reinstatement of such employees. Compliance within two weeks under intimation to the Registrar of this Court. Hearing of the petitions is adjourned as prayed.

H.B.T./W-8/SC Order accordingly.