Pakistan Case Law
1986 PTD 703

DEBPARA TEA CO. LTD., JALPAIGURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL-XIII, CALCUTTA

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1986 PTD 703
CourtCalcutta High Court
Judge(s)Sabyasachi Mukharji and Suhas Chandra Sen

MUKHARJI, J‑ ‑In --‑ view of the facts found by the Tribunal as recorded in the statement of the case that the assessee was a lessee having taken: ease of certain land from the Government of West Bengal on the area of 33 Acres there was tea plantation earlier which was abandoned and during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year the assessee replanted tea plants on a virgin soil of another area of 33 Acres, in our opinion the expenditure of Rupees 48, 435 incurred on such plantation could not have been allowed as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal has, however, directed that the development allowance in respect of the replacement of tea bushes should be allowed and further directed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to take that point into consideration. If that is so, in our opinion, the Tribunal arrived at the correct decision and the question should be answered in that affirmative and in favour of the revenue.

2. Parties will pay and bear their own costs:

SEN, J.‑‑ I agree.

M. B. A. Question answered in affirmative.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.