Pakistan Case Law
2015 GBLR 397

SAIF ULLAH Versus Hafiz EHSAN ULLAH

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation2015 GBLR 397
CourtSupreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan
Judge(s)Raja Jalal-ud-Din, C.J. and Muzaffar Ali

ORDER

1. RAJA JALAL-UD-DIN, C.J.--- The instant petition for leave to appeal has been directed against the Order/Judgment dated 26.02.2015, passed by the learned Chief Court GB and order dated 05.01.2015, passed by the learned Vacation Civil Judge Gilgit. The brief facts of the case are as such that the present petitioner was nominated against the Medical seat reserved for District Diamer as the petitioner is domiciled resident of district Diamer and he had obtained higher marks then the marks obtained by the present respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 1 challenged the bona fide residency of the present petitioner through Suit No. 149/2014. The main suit is subjudice before the learned Civil Judge Gilgit but the interim matter traveled from Civil Court to this Court.

2. We after hearing the present petition for leave to appeal, honestly felt that if the matter is allowed to go through procedural formalities of the Courts then the reserved seat of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad will be lost and none of the parties will be able to avail the reserved seat in said Medical Collage as a short span of time is left to get the admission therein. We feel that the loss will be not only to the parties of the suit but it will affect the Gilgit-Baltistan at large. Therefore, we tried to resolve the matter amicably without going in to the procedural formalities and asked the parties to settle the issue between themselves. They were given various chances for the said purpose, which failed.

3. We intended to avoid any decision on merits, which would follow a lengthy procedure form civil Court up to this Court. Meanwhile, the Secretary Education Gilgit-Baltistan Mr. Sana Ullah came to rescue and proposed to accommodate both the candidates by the formula that on candidate to be nominated this year and the other to be nominated in the next session. We appreciated the proposal as it is plausible and the parties of the petition have also consented to the proposal.

4. Since, the present petitioner has already been nominated against the reserved seat for district Diamer in Ayub Medical Collage Abbottabad, as such, we allow the nomination of the present petitioner in the said Medical Collage against the reserved seat of District Diamer Gilgit-Baltistan for this session. We also declare that the present respondent No. 1 shall be entitled to get admission in Ayub Medical Collage against a reserved seat for Diamer District in the next year. We have taken cognizance matter in exercise of the original jurisdiction of this Court and we disposed the Suit No. 149/2015 calling the file of the suit in terms of the above stated settlement.

5. In view of the matter, the instant leave to appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

6. HBT/190/GB Order accordingly.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.