Pakistan Case Law
1984 SCMR 1052(2)

Shahzada PERVEZ KHAN vs PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF DEFENCE AND ANOTHER

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1984 SCMR 1052(2)
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No, 490 of 1983 Appeal No, 27(R) of
Date1983-10-12
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, M. S. H. Qureshi
ResultPetition dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition challenging a disciplinary action and a finding of fact by a Service Tribunal that the petitioner was not a civil servant, rendering his service appeal incompetent. The core legal question is whether the petitioner qualified as a civil servant capable of maintaining a service appeal before the Service Tribunal. The Supreme Court of Pakistan held that in the absence of any material establishing the scale of pay, the order of appointment, or any subsequent transfer of the petitioner as a civil servant, there was no legal justification to interfere with the factual finding reached by the Tribunal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed. The key principle laid down is that the burden lies upon the claimant to provide material particulars such as pay scale and appointment orders to substantiate their status as a civil servant when challenging a Service Tribunal finding.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether a person challenging a Service Tribunal's finding must provide material evidence such as pay scale and appointment orders to prove civil servant status?
  • Under what circumstances will the Supreme Court interfere with a finding of fact reached by a Service Tribunal?
service tribunalcivil servantdisciplinary actionpetition for leave to appealburden of proof

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAQ AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-The challenge in this petition arising out of a disciplinary action, is to a finding of fact by a Service Tribunal A that the petitioner was not a civil servant hence his so-called service appeal was not competent.

2. ' Learned counsel is unable to give the scale of pay, if any; the order of appointment of the petitioner or subsequent transfer of the petitioner allegedly as a civil servant. That being so, there is no material to justify interference with the finding reached by the Tribunal. This petition accordingly is dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.