AMANUL HAQ vs SAEED HUSS AIN BOKHARI And Other

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal filed by a tenant against an order of a learned Single Judge of the High Court, which had dismissed the petitioner's Second Appeal from Order (S.A.O.) in a rent matter. The respondents-landlords had previously initiated ejectment proceedings against the petitioner on the grounds of property reconstruction, which were successful before the Rent Controller and upheld through subsequent appellate stages. Before the Supreme Court, the petitioner challenged the eviction order solely on the contention that, based on the site plan submitted by the landlords, the specific room occupied by the petitioner would remain unaffected by the proposed reconstruction. Upon reviewing the site plan and examining the relevant evidence presented in the lower courts, the Supreme Court found no merit in the petitioner's argument. Consequently, the Court held that the concurrent findings regarding the necessity of reconstruction were sound and that the petitioner's specific objection regarding the site plan was factually unsubstantiated. The petition for leave to appeal was accordingly dismissed.