ALI AHMAD AND Another vs MUHAMMAD FAZAL AND Another
This matter concerns a dispute over the execution of a consent decree in a pre-emption suit regarding agricultural land. The core legal question was whether a mutation of land based on a civil court consent decree could be sanctioned by revenue authorities when the decree holder had failed to execute the decree within the statutory period of limitation. The Supreme Court reviewed the lower court's decision, which had restored a mutation order despite the decree having become time-barred. The Court held that a decree for pre-emption, once it becomes ineffective due to the failure to execute it within the prescribed period of limitation, cannot be used as a valid basis for sanctioning a mutation of land in the revenue records. The key principle laid down is that revenue authorities cannot bypass the law of limitation by sanctioning mutations based on stale or time-barred civil court decrees. Consequently, the Court found the respondent's reliance on the time-barred decree to be legally unsustainable, thereby setting aside the previous order that had allowed the mutation to proceed.
- Can a mutation of land be sanctioned based on a consent decree that has become time-barred?
- Does the failure to execute a pre-emption decree within the limitation period render the decree ineffective for mutation purposes?
- Are revenue authorities empowered to sanction a mutation based on a civil court decree that is no longer executable?
ORDER
1. WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, J.-The dispute between the parties is in respect of 5 kanals and 1 marlas of land, situated in revenue estate of village Nawan Rangpura, Tehsil and District Gujrat. This land was sold by Siraj Din and his two brothers Muhammad Din and Mehr Din on the 26th October 1960, in favour of A.I Ahmad and Khalil Ahmad. Muhammad Fazal son of Siraj Din filed a suit for pre- emption. The matter was compromised. On the 8th December 1961, an amount of Rs. 7,000 was paid in Court and a consent decree was passed by the Administrative Civil Judge. Respondent No. 1 took no step for execution of decree. On the 5th February 1961, he moved an application before the Revenue Assistant for sanctioning of the mutation on the basis of the decree .Of the civil Court. The Assistant Collector Grade II, sanctioned mutation No. 4209 on the 7th July 1967. The petitioners sought review of this order. The matter was reported to the Collector for permission to review. The Collector granted the requisite permission on the 27th July 1967. On the 7th August 1967, the Assistant Collector Grade II cancelled mutation No. 4209. This order was challenged in appeal and the Collector accepted it on the 23rd 'December 1967. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Collector Grade II for fresh decision. On the 2nd March 1968, the Assistant Collector Grade II, again sanctioned the mutation. On appeal, the Collector set aside this order on the 7th August 1968, on the ground that as the respondent bad not applied for the execution of the decree within the prescribed period of limitation, the decree had become ineffective. The matter was taken to the Additional Commissioner in appeal which was dismissed on the 3rd December 1968. A revision petition was filed before the Member, Board of Revenue, which was dismissed on the 31st July 1959.
2. The respondent challenged this order in Writ Petition No. 792 of 1970 which was accepted by Chauhan, J. On the 1st November 1971. He restored the order of the Assistant Collector Grader II dated the' 2nd March 1968. The matter was taken in L. P. A. No. 252 of 1971 which was dismissed in limine on the 6th April 1972. The petitioners seek permission to file an appeal against the said order.
Cited by 29 cases
- PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Sahiwal Versus BASHIR AHMAD (deceased) 2026 CLC 223
- Razia Begum & 05 others vs Member (Judicial-III) B.O.R., & 12 others 2024 LHC 3377, 2024 PLJ Lahore 698, 2024 CLC 1910
- Samina Naz and 5 others vs Evacuee Trust Properties Board, Through its 2023 LHC 5141, 2024 CLC 682
- Mehmood (deceased) through LRs etc. vs Siraj Ahmad (deceased) 2023 LHC 5072
- Shah Fakhr-e-Alam and others vs Mst. ShauIcat Ara and others 2023 SCP 318, 2023 SCMR 2103
- Amir Rawan and others vs Manzaray and others 2023 YLR 2281
- Province of Punjab through D.O.(R) Sahiwal vs District Judge and others 2022 CLC 908, 2022 [M] CLR 1066
- Muhammad Baaz vs Halqa Putwari Muza Mathra, Peshawar and another 2021 CLC 689
- Nazar Hussain, etc vs Member Board of Revenue, etc 2019 MLD 1876, 2020 [M] C L R 421, 2019 LHC 1696
- SAEEDA SALAHUDDIN Versus Flight Lt. (Retd.) FAROUK AZIZ EFFENDI (LATE) 2020 CLCN 40
- MUHAMMAD RIAZ Versus FIDA HUSSAIN SHAH 2019 CLC 1380
- Begum Tahira Qureshi vs M.B.R., etc 2017 LHC 192
- Begum TAHIRA QURESHI Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE 2017 CLCN 106
- Jalal-ud-Din vs Mst. Rozman and 31 others 2013 C.L.R. 292
- Mst. NIAZ BIBI (deceased) through L.Rs vs GHULAM MUSTAFA, etc. 2011 PLJ SC 702
- Mst. NIAZ BIBI through L.Rs., vs GHULAM MUSTAFA and others 2011 PLD Supreme Court 520
- SHER MUHAMMAD through Legal Heirs vs MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) BOARD OF REVENUE and 4 others 2010 MLD 187
- ALTAF KHAN through L.Rs, and 31 others vs NISAR AHMAD and 20 others 2009 MLD 804
- AHMAD KHAN through legal heirs and others vs GHULAM HUSSAIN and otherss 2007 MLD 857
- ALI MUHAMMAD And 3 Others vs Mst. PATHANI And 2 Other 2001 MLD 1003
- ALI MUHAMMAD & 3 others vs Mst. PATHANI & 2 others 2002 C.L.R. 873
- Sardar MUHAMMAD YOUNUS KHAN vs SENIOR MEMBER 2002 PLC (C.S.) 522
- KALOO and 3 others vs HASSAB BAKHSH and 3 others 2000 YLR 2473
- KHUSHI MUHAMMAD and others vs MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and others 1992 CLC 125
- MUHAMMAD ISHAQ vs MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB AND ANOTHER 1983 PLC (C. S.) 491
- ABDUL SATTAR AND OTHERS vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER 1983 CLC 1124
- ALLAH WASAYA AND 7 OTHERS vs TEHSILDAR/A. C. 1st GRADE. KHANPUR ETC. 1981 CLC 1202
- Sher Muhammad (Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs vs Member K.L.R. 2009 Civil Cases 331
- Sher Muhammad (Deceased) through his Legal Heirs vs Member 2009 C.L.R. 1579