Pakistan Case Law
1985 SCMR 1896

MABOOD KHAN vs AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1985 SCMR 1896
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. K-411 of 1983
Date1984-05-14
Judge(s)S.A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza
Authored byS.A. Nusrat
ResultLeave granted
Summary

This matter comes before the Supreme Court of Pakistan upon a petition for leave to appeal involving the interpretation of the Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978. The core legal question concerns the proper construction and application of the provisions of the said Ordinance regarding corporation employees. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to examine the statutory interpretation of the enactment, ordered security in the sum of one thousand rupees, directed the appeal to be prepared on the existing record with liberty for parties to file additional documents, and instructed the office to fix all connected appeals involving the same legal point for hearing together. The principle laid down relates to the necessity of authoritative judicial interpretation of special powers ordinances affecting corporation employees.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • How are the provisions of the Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978 to be interpreted?
  • Whether leave to appeal should be granted in matters involving the interpretation of the Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978
leave to appealstatutory interpretationcorporation employeesspecial powers ordinance

ORDER

1. S.A. NUSRAT, J.--The question involved in this petition relates to interpretation of the provisions of Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978 (No. XIII of 1978) and we would, therefore, grant leave to appeal.

2. Security Rs.1,000.

3. The appeal to be made ready on the present record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents, if any.

4. The office is directed to fix all the appeals which involve the same point for hearing together.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.