Mst. MARIAM ROZINA vs ROBERT ASHRAF
This criminal miscellaneous application was filed under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the recovery and production of the petitioner's minor daughter, aged about four years, from the custody of the respondent. The petitioner and the respondent are wife and husband, and the minor child is the offspring of their marriage. The core legal question before the High Court was whether a minor child residing with her biological father can be considered to be in illegal or improper custody so as to attract the provisions of Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. The High Court dismissed the application, holding that custody of a minor child with her biological father cannot be deemed illegal or improper detention. The Court laid down the principle that custody disputes between parents should be resolved through appropriate civil remedies under family laws rather than invoking the extraordinary criminal jurisdiction of habeas corpus under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898.
- Whether the custody of a minor child with their biological father can be deemed illegal or improper custody under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
- Can a writ of habeas corpus under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 be used as a substitute for civil proceedings to resolve child custody disputes between spouses?
- Section 491, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
1. ' Petitioner has filed this application under section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus to the opponent/respondent directing him to produce in Court her daughter Miss Shamim, aged about 4 years' for setting her at liberty. The parties are wife and husband inter se. The baby Miss Shamim is off spring of their wedlock. She is under the care and custody of her father, the respondent. It is inconceivable that she is under illegal or improper custody of her father as to attract the provisions of section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The petitioner has resorted to criminal proceedings instead of seeking appropriate redress under Civil Law. The petition seems misconceived and is dismissed.
Cited by 12 cases
- PEGGY COLLIN vs MUHAMMAD ISHFAQUE MALIK and 6 others 2010 PLD Lahore 48
- NOOR SAFIA Versus S.P., SIALKOT 1997 PCRLJ 84
- Miss HINA JILANI, DIRECTOR OF A.G.H.S. LEGAL AID CELL vs SOHAIL BUTT 1995 PLD Lahore 151
- HIROKU MUHAMMAD vs MUHAMMAD LATIF 1994 MLD 1682
- Mst. TAYYABA KHAN vs SYEDA BEGUM and anothers 1994 PLD Karachi 204
- Mst. TAYYABA KHAN vs SYEDA BEGUM End Another 1994 PLD Karachi 204
- Mst. SHAHNAZ KHAWAJA vs RIAZ NASIR KHAWAJA And 2 Other 1996 MLD 24
- Mst. SHAHNAZ KHAWAJA vs RIAZ NASIR KHAWAJA and 2 others 1996 MLD 24
- SHABBIR HUSSAIN vs Mst. SHAHNAZ PARVEEN and another 1989 P Cr. L J 1689
- MUHAMMAD JAVED UMRAO Versus MISS UZMA VAHID 1988 SCMR 1891
- MUHAMMAD NASEER HUMAYON vs Mst. SYEDA UMMATUL KHABIR 1987 SCMR 174
- ASIF MOWJEE vs Mst. FATEMA A. MOWJEE AND ANOTHER 1987 PLD Karachi 239