Pakistan Case Law
1986 SCMR 1664

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/SALES TAX vs O.K. MOTORS COMPANY

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1986 SCMR 1664
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 224-K, 225-K and 226-K of 1985
Date1986-06-11
Judge(s)Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza
Authored byAbdul Kadir Shaikh
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

The matter involves petitions for leave to appeal arising from identical questions of law previously considered in related proceedings. The core legal question concerns the grant of leave to appeal where identical legal issues have already been admitted for consideration by the court. The court's decision is to grant leave to appeal in these petitions as well, directing that the resulting appeals be heard on the same record alongside the connected appeals, with liberty granted to the parties to file additional documents if necessary. The key principle laid down is that where identical questions of law are raised in multiple petitions and leave has already been granted in precedent matters, leave to appeal should similarly be granted to ensure consistent adjudication on the same record.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether leave to appeal should be granted when the questions of law raised are identical to those in a matter where leave has already been granted?
  • Can parties file additional documents in appeals that are ordered to be heard along with connected appeals?
leave to appealidentical questions of lawconnected appealssupreme court practice

ORDER

1. ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.--The questions of law raised in these three petitions are identical to those in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 372-K and 373-K of 1984 Commissioner of Income-tax Karachi v .

2. Pakistan Fisheries Limited in which leave to appeal has been granted. We, therefore, grant leave in these petitions also.

3. Appeal arising out of these petitions will be heard on the same record alongwith connected appeals. It is however open to the parties to file additional documents, if any.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.