Pakistan Case Law
1986 SCMR 803

HIDAYATULLAH vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN And Another

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1986 SCMR 803
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1980
Date1985-11-15
Judge(s)Muhammad Haleem, C. J., Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan
Authored byMuhammad Haleem
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

The appellant, a former Sub-Divisional Magistrate, challenged his dismissal from service which had been effected under Martial Law Regulation No. 58 on May 30, 1970. Following the dismissal of his appeal by the Service Tribunal on November 18, 1979, the appellant sought leave to appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan. During the pendency of these proceedings, C.M.L.A. Order No. 3 of 1982 was promulgated on August 30, 1982, which introduced Article 13-A into the Provisional Constitution Order. The core legal question before the Court was the effect of this new constitutional provision on pending litigation challenging actions taken under Martial Law Regulation No. 58. The Supreme Court held that Article 13-A(b) of the Provisional Constitution Order explicitly validated all actions taken under Martial Law Regulation No. 58 and mandated that all pending proceedings challenging such actions must abate immediately. Consequently, the Court ruled that the appellant's appeal stood abated by operation of law upon the promulgation of the C.M.L.A. Order, resulting in the disposal of the matter without further adjudication on the merits.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the promulgation of Article 13-A of the Provisional Constitution Order cause the abatement of pending appeals challenging dismissals under Martial Law Regulation No. 58?
  • What is the legal effect of Article 13-A(b) of the Provisional Constitution Order on proceedings impugning actions taken under Martial Law Regulation No. 58?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Martial Law Regulation No. 58
  • Article 13-A, Provisional Constitution Order
  • C.M.L.A. Order No. 3 of 1982
service matterabatement of proceedingsMartial Law RegulationProvisional Constitution Orderdismissal from serviceconstitutional validity

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.--The appellant was dismissed from service while serving as Sub- Divisional Magistrate at Lodhran, District Multan, under Martial Law Regulation No. 58, on 30th of May, 1970. He filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal which was dismissed on 18th November, 1979 on merits. Leave to appeal was granted to the appellant on 29th of November, 1980, against the judgment of the n Tribunal. During the pendency of the appeal, C.M.L.A. Order No. 3 of 1982 was promulgated on 30th of August, 1982 whereby Article 13-A was inserted in the Provisional Constitution Order. Article 13-A(b) in terms saves all actions taken under Martial Law Regulation No. 58 and further provides that all proceedings impugning such actions shall abate forthwith.

2. Consequently, the proceedings stood abated as from the date of promulgation of the C. M. L. A.

3. Order No. 3 of 1982.

4. The appeal thus stands disposed of.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.