Pakistan Case Law
1972 SCMR 682

Mst. SHAFTQAN vs HASHIM ALI AND Another

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1972 SCMR 682
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 902/8 Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.
Date1972-05-26
Judge(s)Sajjad Ahmad, Waheeduddin Ahmad and Salahuddin Ahmed
Authored byWaheeduddin Ahmad
ResultPetition dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition for special leave to appeal was filed by the mother of a murder victim against an order of the Lahore High Court granting bail to one of the accused, Hashim Ali. The petitioner challenged the High Court's exercise of discretion in granting bail in a murder case. The Supreme Court of Pakistan examined whether the High Court properly exercised its judicial discretion under the circumstances. The Court observed that there were counter-versions of the incident, making it a matter of trial to determine which party was the aggressor and whether the respondent committed an offence punishable with death or transportation for life. Consequently, the Supreme Court held that the High Court had exercised its discretion properly and dismissed the petition. However, the Court laid down the principle that the complainant/petitioner remains at liberty to move the committing Magistrate for cancellation of bail once sufficient evidence has been recorded during the inquiry or trial.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether bail can be granted in a murder case where there are counter-versions of the incident and the aggressor is yet to be determined?
  • Can a complainant apply for the cancellation of bail before a committing Magistrate after evidence has been recorded, even if the High Court previously granted bail?
bailmurdercancellation of bailjudicial discretioncounter-versionscommitting magistrate

ORDER

1. WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, J.- The petitioner's son Akhtar was murdered on 20th July 1971 and Hafiz Niaz Mohammad, Nisar Ahmad, Hashim and Mohammad Anwar were named as accused persons.

2. They (moved an application for bail before the Sessions Judge, Multan, which was rejected on 19th October 1971. Hafiz Niaz Mohammad and Nisar Ahmad filed an application for bail in the Lahore High Court, which was accepted and they were granted bail by a learned Single Judge of the High Court on 20th December 1971. Nisar was subsequently murdered.

3. Hashim A.I and Mohammad Anwar filed a second applica--petition for bail before the learned Sessions Judge which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Multan, by order dated 31st March 1972. Hashim A.I filed an application for bail before the High Court and he has been granted bail by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court on 5th May 1972. The peti--tioner seeks permission to file an appeal against the said order.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we area satisfied that the High Court has exercised the discretion vested in it properly. There are counter-versions and it is yet to be seen as to who is the aggressor and whether the respondent has committed and offence punishable with death or transportation for life. It will, however, be open to the petitioner to move the committing Magis--trate for the cancellation of bail after some evidence is recorded. Subject to the above remarks the petition is dismissed.

Cited by 35 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.