Pakistan Case Law
1986 SCMR 847

MISAL MUHAMMAD vs The STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1986 SCMR 847
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 1986 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 176 of 1985
Date1986-02-09
Judge(s)Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan
Authored byZaffar Hussain Mirza
ResultI.
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal against the order of the Peshawar High Court cancelling the bail granted to the petitioner, Misal Muhammad, who is charged along with his sons under Section 302/34 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 for the murder of one Farhad. The core legal question was whether the petitioner's medical condition, namely Ischaemic Heart Disease and hypertension, warranted his release on bail on the ground that confinement in jail was hazardous to his life. The Supreme Court converted the petition into an appeal and allowed it, holding that the petitioner was suffering from a serious ailment rendering his confinement hazardous and that the discretion exercised by the Sessions Judge in granting bail was just and proper. The key principle laid down is that where an under-trial prisoner suffers from a serious ailment that cannot be properly managed to the extent of preventing hazard to life within jail custody, bail may be granted on medical grounds.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether an under-trial prisoner suffering from a serious heart disease is entitled to bail on medical grounds?
  • Under what circumstances can the High Court's cancellation of bail be interfered with by the Supreme Court?
  • Does chronic hypertension and Ischaemic Heart Disease render jail confinement hazardous enough to justify bail?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
bailmedical groundsbail cancellationcardiac ailmentcriminal appeal

ORDER

ZAFFAR HUSSAIN MIRZA, J.--Petitioner Misal Muhammad alongwith his two sons is charged under section 302/34, P.P.C, with the murder of one Farhad. His plea for release on bail having been rejected by Magistrate First Class, Mardan, he approached the Sessions Judge Mardan, who granted his application on the ground that he is an infirm man suffering from Ischaemic Heart Disease with high blood pressure, which according to the learned Sessions Judge made his confinement in jail detrimental for his health. On an application by the complainant the learned Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court, by his order, dated 28th September, 1985, cancelled his bail, on the ground that the disease of which the petitioner was certified to be suffering, was not one which cannot be treated inside the jail while he is in custody. The learned Sessions Judge, while granting bail to the petitioner had relied upon a certificate issued by the Medical Superintendent, District Headquarters Hospital, Mardan, dated 20th January, 1985, to the effect that the petitioner, who was under trial prisoner had been referred to him by the Medical Officer Jail and had been admitted as a case of Hypertension with Ischaemic Heart Disease.

2. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the learned Chief Justice, dated 28th September, 1985, cancelling his bail, the petitioner came up before this Court for leave to appeal. This Court by order dated 18th December, 1985, directed that the petitioner be examined by the Heart Specialist, Incharge of the Cardiology Ward, Civil Hospital, Mardan, for detailed opinion. In consequence to this reference the medical certificate from Assistant Professor of Cardiology has been received stating that the petitioner is suffering from severe Hypertension Ischaemic Heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In the opinion of the doctor it is essential that the patient must continue his medication and have regular follow up for control of high blood pressure and heart disease.

3. We have heard Mr. Zahoorul Haq, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Bashirullah Khan, A.A.-G. (N.-W.F.P) on behalf of the State. After taking into consideration the material placed on record we are of the opinion that the petitioner was suffering from serious ailment which rendered his confinement in jail as hazardous to his life and therefore, the discretion exercised by the learned Sessions Judge was just and proper, as has been verified by the further medical examination of the prisoner.

4. In the result, we convert this petition into an appeal and allow it. Bail is granted to the petitioner in the sum of Rs.50,000 on, the same terms and conditions as imposed in the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Mardan, dated 21st January, 1985.

Cited by 3 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.