Mst. SALEEMA BIBI vs GHULAM RASOOL And OTHER

There is a finding by the Additional Settlement (7ommissioner that in the Fard-Taqseem the petitioner was not shown as a member of the family of Shamas Din and that her name was later on interpolated by someone. This is a finding of fact which cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent has placed before me a judgment of this Court reported as Allah Rakhi v. Sughran Bibi NLR 1980 U C 126 in which a view has been taken that the property given for purpose of maintenance only was not inheritable. This being so, the very basis upon which this writ petition was based disappears It is accordingly dismissed with costs.