Pakistan Case Law
1986 SCMR 1671 (1)

S. JAMIL AHMED HASHMI vs SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD And Other

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1986 SCMR 1671 (1)
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 283-K of 1984 Appeal No. 17(K) of 1982
Date1986-02-15
Judge(s)Abdul Qadir Sheikh, S. A. Nusrat
ResultPetition dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter comes before the Supreme Court of Pakistan as a petition for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 27-2-1984, which had dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld his removal from service. The core legal question concerns the legality and factual justification of the petitioner's removal from service and whether the Service Tribunal erred in upholding the same. The Supreme Court held that no exception could be taken in law or on facts against the judgment of the Service Tribunal, as the petitioner was duly proved guilty of the charges framed against him. Consequently, the petition was dismissed. The key principle laid down is that findings of fact by the Service Tribunal regarding the guilt of a civil servant in disciplinary matters, when supported by the record, will not be interfered with by the Supreme Court.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with factual findings of the Federal Service Tribunal regarding charges against a civil servant?
  • Can a petition for leave to appeal be maintained against a judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal upholding removal from service when charges are proved?
service appealremoval from servicepetition for leave to appealdisciplinary proceedingscivil servant

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.--This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 27-2-1984 dismissing petitioner's appeal and thereby upholding the order of his removal from service.

2. We have heard the petitioner who appears in person, and have gone through the record of the case. We find that no exception can be taken in law or on facts against the judgment of the Service Tribunal that the petitioner was proved to be guilty of the charges framed against him.

3. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.