Pakistan Case Law
1986 SCMR 84

Syed GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH Through Legal Heirs vs Syed SADIQ HUSSAIN

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1986 SCMR 84
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 239-R of 1985 in Civil Appeal No. 282 of 1983,
Date1985-10-12
Judge(s)Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C. J, Nasim Hassain Shah and S. A. Nusrat
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a civil miscellaneous petition filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Syed Ghulam Hussain Shah vs. Syed Sadiq Hussain. The core legal question presented to the Court involved a request by the petitioners/appellants for permission to undertake the re-building of a shop that was the subject of the underlying dispute. The Court, exercising its discretion in the civil miscellaneous proceedings, granted the prayer sought by the petitioners. The holding of the Court was that the petitioners were permitted to proceed with the re-building of the disputed shop, subject to the specific condition that such construction would be undertaken entirely at the petitioners' own risk and cost. This decision establishes the principle that a court may grant interim relief allowing for the modification or reconstruction of disputed property during the pendency of litigation, provided that the party seeking such relief assumes full liability for the associated costs and any potential legal consequences arising from the alteration of the property's status quo.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a party to a civil dispute be granted permission by the court to re-build a disputed shop during the pendency of proceedings?
  • Is a court empowered to allow the alteration of disputed property subject to the condition of risk and cost to the applicant?
civil miscellaneous petitioninterim reliefdisputed propertyre-buildingrisk and cost

ORDER

1. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.-- In the civil miscellaneous petitions, the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners/appellants pray for the re-building of the disputed shop. The prayer is accepted at the risk and cost of the petitioners. Order accordingly.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.