Pakistan Case Law
1987 SCMR 1066

A.K.KHALID, MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES) PUNJAB, LAHORE And Others vs REHMAT ALI

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1987 SCMR 1066
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.144 of 1980 Petition No.1918 of
Date1987-02-19
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal
Authored byMuhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition challenged a judgment of the Lahore High Court which had granted proprietary rights in Government land to the respondent. During the proceedings before the Supreme Court, the petitioners' counsel informed the Court that there had been a change in Government policy regarding the subject matter. Consequently, the petitioners indicated they would no longer object to the grant of the excess land, provided that specific conditions were fulfilled. The respondent's counsel agreed that his client would comply with these conditions. Both parties, along with a representative from the Board of Revenue, presented a signed compromise agreement to the Court. The Supreme Court accepted this compromise and disposed of the petition in terms of the agreement, with no order as to costs. The judgment essentially records the settlement reached between the parties based on the revised Government policy, thereby resolving the dispute regarding the proprietary rights without a contested adjudication on the merits.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a petition regarding the grant of proprietary rights in government land be disposed of based on a compromise between the parties?
  • Does a change in government policy regarding land grants constitute a valid basis for settling a pending dispute before the Supreme Court?
proprietary rightsgovernment landcompromise decreepolicy changeland grant

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-- This petition is directed against the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 30-9-1979: Whereby respondent's Constitutional Petition regarding grant of proprietary rights in Government land was allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since the filing of this petition there has been a change in Government policy regarding the subject-matter of this case and that now the petitioners would have no objection to the grant of excess land subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions.

Learned counsel for the respondent has agreed that his client would fulfill the conditions.

3. Accordingly, both the learned counsel and Mr. Muhammad Shafi, Senior Clert, Lease Branch, Board of Revenue, Lahore, have presented a compromise signed by each one of them with a view to be made into an order of this Court.

There shall be no order as to costs.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.