Pakistan Case Law
1987 SCMR 692(1)

FATEH MUHAMMAD KHAN And Others vs THE DEPUTY CLAIMS COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI And Other

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1987 SCMR 692(1)
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Judge(s)Saad Saood Jan, S. A. Nusrat
ResultPetition dismissed
Summary

This petition for special leave to appeal challenged an order of the Lahore High Court, which had dismissed the petitioner's constitutional petition against an order passed by the Deputy Claims Commissioner. The core legal question before the Supreme Court was whether the High Court correctly exercised its discretion in dismissing the constitutional petition on the grounds of laches. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, noting that the Deputy Claims Commissioner's order was passed on 29-1-1977, while the constitutional petition was only filed on 21-11-1979. The Court held that the petitioner failed to provide any satisfactory explanation for the delay of nearly three years in approaching the High Court. Consequently, the principle laid down is that a constitutional petition may be dismissed on the grounds of laches when there is an inordinate, unexplained delay in seeking judicial review of an administrative order, thereby justifying the refusal of the High Court to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a constitutional petition be dismissed on the grounds of laches due to an unexplained delay of nearly three years?
  • Is an unexplained delay in filing a constitutional petition a valid basis for a High Court to refuse to exercise its jurisdiction?
lachesconstitutional petitiondelayjudicial reviewdiscretionary jurisdictionadministrative order

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the order dated 18-12-1979 of the Lahore High Court, dismissing the constitutional petition of the petitioner from an order dated 29-1-1977 of the Deputy Claims Commissioner.

2. One of the grounds taken by the High Court in dismissing the constitutional petition was that it suffered from laches. It may be mentioned that the Deputy Claims Commissioner had passed his order on 29-1-1977. The constitutional petition was not moved in the High Court till 21-11-1979. There is no satisfactory explanation why the petitioner took almost three years in approaching the High Court. We' would accordingly dismiss this petition.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.