Pakistan Case Law
1987 SCMR 1524

MUBARIK Alias MARRI vs The STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1987 SCMR 1524
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Jail , Petition No. 29-R of 1986 Crl. Appeal No. 341 of 1983
Date1987-05-19
Judge(s)Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan
Authored bySaad Saood Jan
ResultPetition dismissed
Summary

The petitioner, Mubarik alias Marri, was convicted under Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, and sentenced to death, a decision subsequently upheld by the High Court. The petitioner filed two separate petitions for special leave to appeal against his conviction: one through counsel and another through jail. Due to an administrative oversight, the jail petition was not brought to the Court's attention when the counsel-filed petition was heard and dismissed on its merits. The second petition, submitted through jail, was filed with a delay of 58 days. The Supreme Court addressed the procedural irregularity and the issue of limitation. The Court held that since the initial petition had already been heard and dismissed on merits after providing the petitioner's counsel a full hearing, and given that the subsequent jail petition was time-barred by 58 days, there were no grounds to entertain the second petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the jail petition.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a second petition for special leave to appeal be entertained when a prior petition filed through counsel has already been dismissed on merits?
  • Does a delay of 58 days in filing a jail petition for special leave to appeal warrant dismissal when the merits of the case were previously adjudicated?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
special leave to appealcriminal appeallimitation periodjail petitionconvictionprocedural delay

1. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The petitioner, Mubarik alias Marri was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad of an offence under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code and was sentenced to death. His conviction and sentence were maintained and confirmed by the High Court. He preferred two petitions for special leave to appeal. One was directly filed in this Court through counsel and the other was submitted through jail. Unfortunately when the petition directly filed in this Court came up for hearing the jail petition was not brought to our notice. The former petition was dismissed on merits after the petitioner's counsel had been given a hearing. The second petition preferred through jail is barred by 58 days. In the circumstances we would dismiss this petition as well.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.