ARAFAT WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. vs INCOME-TAX OFFICER ,
This matter concerns an appeal against a judgment of the High Court dated 16-1-1986, which had presumably upheld certain tax-related notices issued by the Income-Tax Officer. The core legal question before the Supreme Court of Pakistan involved the validity of an impugned notice dated 18-9-1984, along with subsequent notices dated 20-1-1985 and 26-1-1985, issued to the appellant, Arafat Woollen Mills Ltd. The Supreme Court, upon review, allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's judgment. Consequently, the Court allowed the appellant's Constitution petition, declaring the impugned notices to be issued without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The Court further issued a permanent restraint against the respondent, prohibiting them from acting upon, implementing, or taking any further action in pursuance of the aforementioned notices, either personally or through any agency. The judgment establishes the principle that administrative notices issued without lawful authority are void ab initio and unenforceable, and that the judiciary possesses the power to restrain tax authorities from acting upon such invalid notices to protect the rights of the taxpayer.
- Can a court declare tax notices issued without lawful authority to be of no legal effect?
- Does a court have the power to restrain tax authorities from acting upon invalid notices?
- Is a Constitution petition an appropriate remedy to challenge administrative notices issued without lawful authority?
ORDER
1. ' ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.-- For the reasons recorded separately, this appeal is allowed with the result that the impugned judgment of the High Court dated 16-1-1986 is set aside and the Constitution petition filed by the appellant is allowed with the result that the impugned notice dated 18-9-1984 and all subsequent notices dated 20-1-1985 and 26-1-1985 are declared as without lawful authority and of no legal effect, and the respondent is restrained from acting on the impugned notices or implementing the same or taking any further action in pursuance thereto himself or through any agency or in any manner whatsoever. The appellant shall also be entitled to costs.