Pakistan Case Law
1989 SCMR 464

INAYAT BEGUM and others vs THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1989 SCMR 464
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions Nos.860 & 861 of 1987
Date1988-09-10
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah andSaad Saood Jan
Authored byMuhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultLeave to appeal granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns two petitions for leave to appeal filed by landlords against a High Court judgment that dismissed their writ petitions, thereby overturning an eviction order previously granted by the Rent Controller. The core legal question addressed by the Supreme Court involves the propriety of granting leave to appeal in a rent restriction matter where the parties have initiated out-of-court settlement negotiations and where the interests of students in a girls' school, currently occupying the premises as tenants, are at stake. The Court, noting the likelihood of a settlement and the public interest regarding the students' education, granted leave to appeal. The ratio of the decision emphasizes the Court's discretion to facilitate amicable resolutions in tenancy disputes, particularly when broader social or educational interests are implicated. The Court directed the preparation of appeals based on the existing record, permitted the filing of additional documents, and adjourned the proceedings to allow further time for the parties to finalize their negotiations.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can the Supreme Court grant leave to appeal in a rent restriction matter to facilitate out-of-court settlement negotiations?
  • Is the potential impact on the education of students occupying rented premises a relevant factor for the Court when considering leave to appeal in an eviction case?
rent restrictionevictionleave to appealout-of-court settlementtenancy disputelandlord-tenant

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--These two petitions by the landlord side in Rent Restriction matter are directed against the dismissal by the High Court of their Writ Petitions. Earlier the eviction application against the respondents side was allowed by the learned Rent Controller but the respondents' appeal was allowed by the District Court.

2. These petitions were heard by this Bench last week. The parties have entered into meaningful negotiations and settlement out of Court. Both the learned counsel have today stated that there is every likelihood of a settlement out of Court.

3. ' In order to afford a further opportunity for negotiations in the context that the question of the studies of students of the Girls School concerned as tenant in these cases is also involved, we grant leave to appeal. Grant of leave has not been objected to from the respondents side.

4. ' Security Rs,5,000 in each case.

5. ' The appeals shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties concerned to file all necessary additional documents.

6. ' To come up in the month of November, 1988. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.