Pakistan Case Law
1989 SCMR 1121

LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION vs AKBAR ALI AKHTAR and another

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1989 SCMR 1121
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No,734 of 1985
Date1989-03-29
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Saad Saood Jan
Authored byMuhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultLeave refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal filed by the Lahore Municipal Corporation against the respondents, Akbar Ali Akhtar and another, challenging a judgment of the lower forum. The core legal question concerned whether the reliefs and declaration granted to the plaintiff-respondents provided blanket protection to unauthorized constructions or if municipal authorities retained statutory powers over them. The Supreme Court of Pakistan declined to grant leave to appeal, holding that the petitioner had already been granted sufficiently effective relief in the final paragraph of the impugned judgment. The Court clarified that the declaration and reliefs awarded to the respondents were explicitly subject to provisos stating that the decree would not protect unauthorized structures, that the respondents must obtain sanction from the competent authority before any future construction, and that the Lahore Municipal Corporation remained fully competent to demolish unauthorized structures in accordance with the law. The key principle laid down is that judicial decrees protecting a party's rights do not legitimize unauthorized structures and do not oust the statutory authority of municipal corporations to demolish illegal constructions in accordance with the law.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does a judicial decree in favor of a plaintiff protect unauthorized structures raised by them?
  • Is a municipal corporation competent to demolish unauthorized structures despite a declaration granted by a court?
  • Whether leave to appeal should be granted when the impugned judgment sufficiently safeguards the petitioner's powers under the law?
leave to appealunauthorized structuremunicipal corporationdemolition of structuressanction of building plans

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.-- After hearing the learned counsel in support of this petition we do not consider it necessary to grant leave to appeal, as in our view, in the circumstances of the case, the petitioner has been allowed sufficiently effective relief in the last paragraph (No,4) of the impugned judgment.

2. ' When properly understood the said part of the judgment means that the declaration and other reliefs granted to the respondents, are subject to the following provisos:--

(1) "The decree shall not protect the unauthorised structure raised by the plaintiff-respondents.

(2) They shall obtain a sanction of the competent authority before raising any structure and

(3) The Lahore Municipal Corporation will be competent to demolish the unauthorised structure in accordance with law."

3. ' In the light of what is stated above leave to appeal, with the foregoing observations, is refused.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.