PAK TRADE AFFILIATION vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ZONE 'A' and others
This matter arose from three petitions for leave to appeal filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan by a firm of contractors challenging the dismissal of its writ petitions by the High Court. The petitioner had filed its income tax returns before the Contractors Circle III, Zone 'A', Lahore, but assessment orders were subsequently passed by an Income-tax Officer of a different circle in Zone 'B' without knowledge of the initial filings. Upon discovering this procedural irregularity, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Zone 'A', set aside the assessment orders under Section 138 of the Income-tax Ordinance. The core legal question was whether the Commissioner acted within his lawful authority and without illegality in setting aside assessment orders passed by an Income-tax Officer lacking proper jurisdiction over the returns filed. The Supreme Court held that the order of the Commissioner suffered from no illegality, affirming that assessments conducted by an unauthorized circle without disclosure of pending returns in the correct circle are liable to be set aside. Leave to appeal was accordingly refused and the petitions were dismissed.
- Whether a Commissioner of Income-tax has the lawful authority under Section 138 of the Income-tax Ordinance to set aside an assessment order passed by an Income-tax Officer of another circle?
- Can an assessment order passed by an Income-tax Officer lacking proper jurisdiction over the filed returns be set aside for irregularity?
- Section 138, Income-tax Ordinance
ORDER
' SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The petitioner in these three petitions is a Firm of contractors. It submitted returns of its income for the assessm ent years in question before the Contractors Circle III, Zone 'A', Lahore. However, before the Income-tax Officer of the said circle could process the assessment, the Income-tax Officer of another circle falling in Zone 'B' passed the assessment orders. It is to be noticed that the petitioner did not disclose to the officer finalizing the assessment that it had filed the returns in the Contractors Circle. When this irregularity came to the notice of the Commissioner of Income-tax in charge of Zone 'A', he set aside the assessment in exercise of his power under section 138 of the Income-tax Ordinance. The petitioner challenged the orders of the Commissioner in writ jurisdiction but without any success. It now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. After hearing the learned counsel we are not satisfied that the order of the Commissioner suffers from any illegality. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed.