Pakistan Case Law
1989 SCMR 1484

ZULFIQAR and 12 others vs GULZAR AHMAD alias LALA and 2 others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1989 SCMR 1484
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No,719 of 1985
Date1989-03-28
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan
Authored byMuhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal filed by defendants against the dismissal of their Regular Second Appeal by the High Court. The underlying suit was for a declaration. The core legal question presented to the Supreme Court was whether the High Court possessed the authority and discretion to permit the conversion of a Regular Second Appeal into a Civil Revision. The Supreme Court, relying on the precedent established in the case of Karamat Hussain and others v. Muhammad Zaman and others (PLD 1987 SC 319), held that the High Court erred in its approach regarding this conversion. The Court found that the legal position favored the petitioners, thereby determining that the High Court should have allowed such conversion under the circumstances. Consequently, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal, directing that the appeal proceed on the existing record while allowing parties to submit necessary additional documents for the final disposal of the matter. This judgment reinforces the procedural flexibility available to appellate courts in managing the classification of appeals and revisions.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a High Court permit the conversion of a Regular Second Appeal into a Civil Revision?
  • Does the precedent in Karamat Hussain and others v. Muhammad Zaman and others support the conversion of a Regular Second Appeal into a Civil Revision?
Regular Second AppealCivil RevisionConversion of proceedingsLeave to appealProcedural law

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the defendants' side in a suit for declaration, against the dismissal by the High Court, of their Regular Second Appeal which had arisen out of respondents' suit for declaration.

2. The question involved in this case whether the High Court could (and should) not have permitted the conversion of the Regular Second Appeal into a Civil Revision stands decided by this Court in the case of 'Karamat Hussain and others v. Muhammad Zaman and others' (PLD 1987 SC 319) which goes in favour of the petitioner.

3. ' Leave to appeal, accordingly, is granted. No security.

4. ' The appeal shall be prepared on its present record with direction to the parties to file all additional documents which would be necessary for disposal of appeal, and, it shall be fixed for hearing during the next session.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.