Pakistan Case Law
1990 PLD Supreme Court 1172

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another vs N.W.F.P. GOVERNMENT and others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1990 PLD Supreme Court 1172
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Petitions Nos. 1-R, 3 & Shariat Miscellaneous Petitions Nos.327-L, 9 to 11 and
Date1990-08-29
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, C.,J., Nasim Hasan Shah, Shafiur Rahman, Pir Muhammad Karam Shah and Maulana Muhammad Taqi Usmani
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a review petition regarding the enforcement of Islamic laws of Qisas and Diyat. Following a statement by the Attorney-General, the Supreme Court addressed the timeline for the promulgation and implementation of the Ordinance relating to Qisas and Diyat. The Court held that the Ordinance must be promulgated by 5th September 1990 and fully enforced by 12th Rabi-ul-Awwal 1411 A.H. The Court further ordered that the previous decision declaring certain existing provisions repugnant to the injunctions of Islam would take effect on 12th Rabi-ul-Awwal 1411 A.H., at which point those repugnant provisions shall cease to have effect. Crucially, the Court established that if the new law is not enacted or lapses, a legal vacuum shall not exist; instead, the common Islamic law and injunctions of Islam regarding Qatl and Jurh (hurt) as contained in the Qur'an and Sunnah shall immediately become the applicable law, with the Pakistan Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code applied mutatis mutandis to facilitate the administration of justice.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • What is the legal consequence if the Ordinance for Qisas and Diyat is not enacted or lapses by the specified deadline?
  • Can the common Islamic law/injunctions of Islam be applied directly in the absence of statutory law regarding Qatl and Jurh?
  • Does the Pakistan Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code remain applicable in the event of a statutory vacuum regarding Qisas and Diyat?
  • Can the Court extend the effective date of a declaration of repugnancy to allow for the implementation of new legislation?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Pakistan Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Qisas and DiyatIslamic LawRepugnancyQatl and JurhStatutory VacuumConstitutional LawEnforcement of Ordinance

ORDER

1. ' The learned Attorney-General has made a statement before us that the Ordinance relating to enforcement of the provisions of Qisas and Diyat has been drafted and is at present in the process of final scrutiny which should be completed within a couple of days and the necessary Ordinance promulgated by 5th September, 1990. He has further stated that to familiarise the enforcement agencies with the new provisions and to ensure their proper implementation the provisions of the proposed Ordinance shall he enforced by 12th Rabi-ul-Awwal 1411 A.H. He has prayed that the Review Petition may he disposed of in the light of his above statement, as it has become infructuous.

2. 'We consider that in view of the importance of the subject and to prevent any chaos and disruptiiin in the administration of criminal justice some time should be allowed to educate and familiarise the enforcement agencies with the new provisions. We, therefore, accept the submission of the learned Attorney-General.

3. ' The new Ordinance incorporating the provisions relating to Qisas and Diyat shall be promulgated by 5th September, 1990 and all the provisions thereof shall be enforced at the latest by 12th Rabi- ul-Awwal 1411 A.H.

4. ' Accordingly, it is ordered that the decision of this Court dated 5th July, 1989, whereby the provisions declared and held therein as repugnant to the injunctions of Islam, and which was to take effect on 23rd March, 1990, would now, on the disposal of this Review Petition, shall take effect on 12th day of Rabi-ul-Awwal 1411 A.H.; on which day the said provisions to the extent they have been declared and held to be repugnant to the injunctions of Islam, shall cease to have effect.

5. ' It is also held and ordered that even if the required law is not enacted and/or enforced by 12th of Rabi-ul-Awwal 1411 A.H., the said provisions would nevertheless cease to have effect on 12th Rabi- ul-Awwal. In such state of vacuum, vis-a-vis, the statute law on the subject, the common Islamic law/the injunctions of Islam as contained in the Qur'an and Sunnah relating to the offence of Qatl and Jurh (hurt) shall he deemed to be the law on the subject. The Pakistan Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code shall then be applied mutatis mutandis, only as aforestated. The same will be the position if an Ordinance for the law of Qisas and Diyat is enforced on or before 12th Rabi- ul-Awwal and the same lapses or otherwise becomes unenforceable due to any reason, creating a similar vacuum in the statute law on the subject. In the aforevisualised situations, the Courts, while hearing and deciding the cases of Qatl and Jurh (hurt) in accordance with common Islamic law/injunctions of Islam as contained in Qura'an and Sunnah may also seek guidance from the provisions of the aforementioned Ordinance if it, in the meanwhile, having once been enforced, had lapsed or otherwise had become un-enforceable. All these matters stand disposed of.

Cited by 35 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.