Pakistan Case Law
1990 P Cr. L J 731

MATWALLI alias MUTALLI vs THE STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1990 P Cr. L J 731
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Appeal Special Court No, 9/BWP of 1989
Date1989-10-10
Judge(s)Muhammad Sharif and Mian Allah Nawaz
Authored byMuhammad Sharif
ResultAppeal accepted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This criminal appeal arises from a trial where the appellant, Matwalli alias Mutalli, was acquitted of charges under sections 302, 392, 397, 109, and 412 read with section 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 by the Special Court for Speedy Trials No. VI, Bahawalpur. Despite the acquittal, the trial court ordered the confiscation of the appellant's licensed gun, which was not involved in the alleged incident. The core legal question before the High Court was whether the trial court possessed the legal authority to confiscate a licensed weapon that was unrelated to the commission of the offense for which the accused was acquitted. The High Court held that in the absence of any nexus between the licensed weapon and the alleged crime, the confiscation order was unsustainable. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal and directed the restoration of the licensed gun to the appellant. The judgment affirms the principle that property not connected to the commission of an offense cannot be confiscated by the State upon the acquittal of the accused.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a trial court confiscate a licensed weapon belonging to an accused person who has been acquitted of the charges?
  • Is a licensed weapon that was not used in the commission of an alleged offense subject to confiscation by the State?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 392, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 397, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 109, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 412, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 34, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
confiscation of propertylicensed weaponacquittalrestoration of propertycriminal appeal

1. MUHAMMAD SHARIF, J.--- The appellant faced trial under sections 302, 392, 397, 109, 412 read with section 34, P.P.C. The appellant Matwalli alias Mutalli and his co-accused Rehmat Ali were acquitted by the learned Judge Punjab, Special Court for Speedy Trials No,VI, Bahawalpur on 8-2- 1989. Even after the acquittal of the appellant, his licensed gun was ordered to be confiscated. The said gun was not used during this incident. The appellant has submitted that his licensed gun may be given to him and may not be confiscated in favour of the State. Learned A.A.-G. Does not oppose this legal position. We, therefore, accept this appeal and order restoration of the licensed gun to the appellant. The appeal stands disposed of.

Cited by 4 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.