Pakistan Case Law
1990 SCMR 696

MUHAMMAD AALAM vs CHIRAGH DIN

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1990 SCMR 696
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No,162 of 1986
Date1989-06-19
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Ghulam Mujaddid and S. Usman Ali Shah
Authored byMuhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultParties compromised.
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter originated as a petition for leave to appeal filed by a plaintiff in a civil suit concerning a declaration and permanent injunction. The core legal question before the Supreme Court of Pakistan was whether the parties could settle the dispute through an out-of-court compromise at the appellate stage and whether such a compromise could be formally recorded and made part of the court's order. Upon representation by learned counsel for both parties that a genuine compromise deed had been executed and that no legal impediments existed to its implementation, the Court accepted the compromise. The Court held that the petition for leave to appeal should be converted into an appeal and disposed of in accordance with the terms of the compromise deed. The key principle laid down is that the Supreme Court possesses the authority to record and give effect to a compromise reached between parties during appellate proceedings, thereby disposing of the matter in terms of the settlement, provided the compromise is verified as genuine and legally permissible.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a petition for leave to appeal be converted into an appeal to give effect to a compromise between parties?
  • Does the Supreme Court have the authority to dispose of a matter in terms of a compromise deed reached between parties during appellate proceedings?
compromiseout-of-court settlementcivil appealpermanent injunctionsuit for declaration

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.--In this leave to appeal petition filed by a plaintiff in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, according to learned counsel appearing for the parties, the latter have settled the matter out of Court and have also drawn a compromise deed.

2. The learned counsel further stated that they have satisfied themselves that the compromise is genuine and that there is no impediment in its being acted upon. The compromise is recorded and made part of this order in the form of its photostat copy as follows:-- [Urdu version omitted] ' The aforerecorded compromise in the above circumstances is accepted. This petition is converted into appeal and the same is disposed of in terms of said compromise. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. Parties compromised.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.