Pakistan Case Law
1990 SCMR 924

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE SOOMRO vs WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1990 SCMR 924
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No, 578-K of 1989
Date1989-09-07
Judge(s)Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza, Javid Iqbal and Naimuddin
Authored byShafiur Rahman
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter comes before the Supreme Court of Pakistan upon a petition for leave to appeal concerning the pro forma promotion of the petitioner in Grade-17. The core legal questions involve whether the petitioner's promotion with effect from a specific date was unlawfully made subject to passing a promotion examination when no such requirement was prescribed under the applicable rules at the time, and whether the petitioner faced unreasonable discrimination compared to similarly situated individuals who received exemptions. The court granted leave to appeal under Article 212(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 to examine these questions. As part of its interim holding, the court ordered that the condition requiring the petitioner to pass the promotion examination shall remain in abeyance pending the final disposal of the appeal, while directing the respondent to submit comments.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the pro forma promotion of a civil servant can be made subject to passing a promotion examination when no such examination was prescribed under the rules at the relevant time?
  • Whether a civil servant is subjected to unreasonable discrimination when similarly situated colleagues are granted exemptions from passing the same promotion examination?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Article 212(3), Constitution of Pakistan 1973
pro forma promotionpromotion examinationservice appealdiscriminationleave to appeal

ORDER

' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--Leave to appeal is granted under Article 212(3) of the Constitution to examine the following questions of law arising in the case:--

(1) Whether the pro forma promotion of the Petitioner in Grade-17 w,e,f. 12-1-1978 had been made subject to his passing the promotion examination when no such examination was prescribed for promotion under the Rules as on 12-1-1978?

(2) Whether the petitioner is not being unreasonably discriminated against, as others named by him in similar positions were granted exemptions from passing the same promotion examination?

2. In view of the short legal questions being involved, let the respondent furnish its comments on these two points and the appeal he made ready for additional documents. In the meantime, the condition of passing the promotion examination shall remain in abeyance.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.