MUHAMMAD RAFIQ KHAN vs MIRAJ DIN and 4 others

This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal seeking to challenge the concurrent dismissal of the petitioner's suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell land by the trial court, appellate court, and revisional court. The core legal question is whether the authenticity of the disputed agreement to sell was established and whether any substantial question of law arose from the concurrent findings of fact. The Supreme Court held that the agreement to sell was not established as authentic and, finding no question of law involved against the concurrent findings of fact, refused leave to appeal. The key principle laid down is that the Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of fact regarding the execution and authenticity of an agreement to sell where no substantial question of law is made out.