SHER BAHADUR vs THE GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. through the Secretary for Agriculture and another
This petition for leave to appeal was filed against an order of the N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal, Peshawar, which had dismissed the petitioner's service appeal. The core legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Service Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of limitation. Specifically, the Tribunal had found that the appeal was filed one day beyond the prescribed period of limitation and that the petitioner had failed to file an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to seek condonation of this delay. Upon hearing the petitioner in person, the Supreme Court examined the record and determined that the petitioner could not demonstrate any error in the Tribunal's finding regarding the delay or the absence of a condonation application. Consequently, the Supreme Court held that there were no valid grounds for interference with the Tribunal's order. The petition was dismissed, reaffirming the principle that an appellate forum is justified in dismissing an appeal as time-barred when the statutory period of limitation has expired and no formal application for condonation of delay has been submitted.
- Can a Service Tribunal dismiss an appeal as time-barred if no application for condonation of delay is filed?
- Is a delay of one day in filing an appeal sufficient grounds for dismissal by a Service Tribunal if no condonation is sought?
- Section 5 of the Limitation Act
ORDER
1. ' NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.----The N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal Peshawar dismissed the appeal of the petitioner on the ground that the appeal filed before it was barred by one day and that no application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of this delay had been filed by him.
2. ' The petitioner, in this petition for leave to appeal, has challenged the aforesaid order of the Service Tribunal.
3. We have heard the petitioner who has appeared before us in person Unfortunately he has not been able to show that the Tribunal was in error in holding the appeal to be barred by one day or in observing that no application for condonation of delay was filed on the basis of which the delay might be condoned.
4. ' No ground for interference, therefore, is made out. Dismissed.
Cited by 23 cases
- PESCO Versus Dr. KASHMALA ORAKZAI 2026 PLD 125
- Ghulam Hussain Iqbalani (Deceased) through Legal Heirs and 2 others vs The Federation Of Pakistan and others 2020 PLC (C.S.) 948
- NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN Versus SHAMOON KHAN 2010 PLC(CS) 608
- SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE and another vs AHMAD YAR KHAN 2010 PLC (C.S.) 495
- SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE and another vs AHMAD YAR KHAN 2010 SCMR 861
- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, QUETTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (QESCO) Versus Rana SHAMIM AKHTAR 2010 PLC(CS) 435
- Mrs. RASHIDA ASIF vs Mrs. AASIA GONDAL and others 2010 SCMR 450
- Mrs. RASHIDA ASIF Versus Mrs. AASIA GONDAL 2010 PLC(CS) 357
- MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR Versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, SERVICES HOSPITAL, LAHORE 2006 PLC(CS) 405
- HABIB BANK LTD. vs GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAIRATI 2006 PLJ SC 921
- HABIB BANK LIMITED vs GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAIRATI , . ( 2007 PLC (C.S.) 997
- HABIB BANK LIMITED vs GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAIRATI 2008 SCMR 1516
- GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAIRATI vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabd and another 2005 PLC (C.S.) 417
- ATTAULLAH BROHI vs SINDH AGRICULTURAL SUPPLIES ORGANIZATION through Managing Director, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 3 others 2004 PLC (C.S.) 1300
- MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHIMUHAMMAD TA_1650169d 2003 PLD Supreme Court 724
- MUHAMMAD TAHIR ACHAKZAI and others MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI SOUTHERN G_ee427567 2003 PLC (C.S.) 796
- NAZAKAT ALI Versus WAPDA 2004 PLC(CS) 163
- Dr, FIDA MUHAMMAD vs SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2002 PLC (C.S.) 474
- KHALID KARIM CHAUDHRY and others vs THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE and 3 others 2002 PLC (C.S.) 1113
- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, QUETTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (QESCO) & 2010 PLJ SC 399
- SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE and another vs AHMED YAR KHAN 2010 PLJ SC 840
- Secretary Local Govt. & Rural Development, Govt. of Punjab Lahore and another vs Ahmad Yar Khan 2010 C.L.R. 1169
- BABER GUL Versus SOHAIL AHMAD SHEIKH 2002 PLC(CS) 160