Pakistan Case Law
1990 SCMR 1519

SHER BAHADUR vs THE GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. through the Secretary for Agriculture and another

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1990 SCMR 1519
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No,100-P 01 1987
Date1989-07-02
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah and S.Usman Ali Shah
Authored byNasim Hasan Shah
ResultLeave refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition for leave to appeal was filed against an order of the N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal, Peshawar, which had dismissed the petitioner's service appeal. The core legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Service Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of limitation. Specifically, the Tribunal had found that the appeal was filed one day beyond the prescribed period of limitation and that the petitioner had failed to file an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to seek condonation of this delay. Upon hearing the petitioner in person, the Supreme Court examined the record and determined that the petitioner could not demonstrate any error in the Tribunal's finding regarding the delay or the absence of a condonation application. Consequently, the Supreme Court held that there were no valid grounds for interference with the Tribunal's order. The petition was dismissed, reaffirming the principle that an appellate forum is justified in dismissing an appeal as time-barred when the statutory period of limitation has expired and no formal application for condonation of delay has been submitted.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a Service Tribunal dismiss an appeal as time-barred if no application for condonation of delay is filed?
  • Is a delay of one day in filing an appeal sufficient grounds for dismissal by a Service Tribunal if no condonation is sought?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 5 of the Limitation Act
service appeallimitation periodcondonation of delayservice tribunalleave to appeal

ORDER

1. ' NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.----The N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal Peshawar dismissed the appeal of the petitioner on the ground that the appeal filed before it was barred by one day and that no application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of this delay had been filed by him.

2. ' The petitioner, in this petition for leave to appeal, has challenged the aforesaid order of the Service Tribunal.

3. We have heard the petitioner who has appeared before us in person Unfortunately he has not been able to show that the Tribunal was in error in holding the appeal to be barred by one day or in observing that no application for condonation of delay was filed on the basis of which the delay might be condoned.

4. ' No ground for interference, therefore, is made out. Dismissed.

Cited by 23 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.