Pakistan Case Law
1991 SCMR 1351(1)

Haji Syed ABDUL HALEEM SHAH vs WALI DAD And 6 Other

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1991 SCMR 1351(1)
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 32-Q of 1990 Civil Revision No.262 of
Date1990-08-22
Judge(s)Ajmal Mian, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, Shafi-ur-Rehman
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court regarding the law of pre-emption. The core legal dispute centers on the sufficiency of evidence required to establish the two essential requirements of pre-emption under Islamic law: Talab-e-Mowasibat (the immediate demand) and Talab-e-Ishhad (the demand with invocation). The Majlis-e-Shoora had previously determined that the evidence regarding Talab-e-Mowasibat was deficient. Conversely, the High Court, in the impugned judgment, concluded that the evidence regarding Talab-e-Ishhad was deficient. The petitioner challenged these findings, contending that the evidence on record was sufficient to satisfy both legal requirements. Upon review, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to examine whether the lower courts erred in their respective assessments of the evidentiary record concerning these demands. The Court's decision to grant leave signifies that the findings of the lower forums regarding the deficiency of evidence in the pre-emption process require further judicial scrutiny to determine if the legal standards for establishing these demands were correctly applied to the facts presented.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the evidence on record sufficiently establish the requirements of Talab-e-Mowasibat and Talab-e-Ishhad in a pre-emption claim?
  • Can a finding of evidentiary deficiency regarding Talab-e-Mowasibat by the Majlis-e-Shoora be reconciled with a finding of deficiency regarding Talab-e-Ishhad by the High Court?
pre-emptionTalab-e-MowasibatTalab-e-Ishhadleave to appealsufficiency of evidence

ORDER

1. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---Leave to appeal is granted in view of the fact that the Majlis-e-Shoora have found evidence on Talab-e-Mowasibat deficient while the High Court by the impugned judgment has found evidence on Talab-e-Ishhad deficient. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the evidence on record to establish that there was deficiency in neither.

2. Security Rs. 2,000.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.