Mst. DARVESHAN JAN vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM And Another
This matter comes before the Supreme Court of Pakistan upon a petition for leave to appeal filed by the petitioner, Mst. Darveshan Jan, challenging the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, dated 7th November, 1988. The core legal question concerns whether respondent No.2, Sardar Hussain, possessed a superior right of pre-emption and was lawfully entitled to a decree for possession of the disputed land based on the facts and material on record. Upon hearing arguments, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to examine this question. The Court ordered the petitioner to furnish security in the sum of Rs. 5,000, directed that the appeal be heard on the existing record, and granted liberty to the parties to file additional documents deemed necessary for the final disposal of the appeal. The key principle established is that the determination of a superior right of pre-emption requires a careful appraisal of the factual matrix and record.
- Whether a respondent can be held as having a superior right of pre-emption based on the facts and material on record?
- Is a party entitled to a decree for possession of land in a pre-emption dispute without establishing a superior right?
ORDER
RUSTUM S. SIDHWA, J.---This is a petition filed by Mst. Darveshan Jan petitioner seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, dated 7th November, 1988.
2. Arguments heard.
3. Leave is granted to consider the question whether, on the facts and the material on record, Sardar Hussain, respondent No.2, could be held as having superior right of pre-emption and whether he was entitled to a decree for possession of the land in dispute. The petitioner shall furnish security in the sum of Rs. 5,000. The appeal shall be heard on the basis of the present record. Parties are at liberty to file further documents which they consider necessary for the full and final disposal of the appeal.