Pakistan Case Law
1991 SCMR 387

SHAUKAT HAYAT KHAN And Others vs GOVERNMENT OF N. W.F.P. And Other

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1991 SCMR 387
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.503-R of 1989 Civil Revision No.38 of 1
Date1989-02-27
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zillah, CJ. and Rustam S. Sidhwa
Authored byRustam S. Sidhwa
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter originated as a petition for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench, Abbottabad, dated 13-6-1989. The core legal question before the Supreme Court of Pakistan concerned the propriety of the High Court granting partial relief to the respondent-Government in motion proceedings without providing notice to the petitioners. Upon hearing arguments, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal. The Court held that the matter warranted reconsideration, specifically addressing the procedural irregularity of the High Court's decision-making process in the absence of the petitioners. Consequently, the Supreme Court directed that the case be remanded to the Peshawar High Court for a re-hearing of the revision petition. The Court established the principle that judicial relief, particularly in revision proceedings, cannot be granted to one party in motion proceedings without affording the opposing party notice and an opportunity to be heard, as this violates fundamental principles of natural justice and fair procedure. The petitioners were ordered to furnish security, and parties were granted liberty to file further documentation for the final disposal of the appeal.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a High Court grant relief in a revision petition during motion proceedings without issuing notice to the opposing party?
  • Is it a procedural irregularity to decide a revision petition without hearing the affected party?
leave to appealnatural justiceright to be heardprocedural irregularityrevision petitionmotion proceedingsremand

ORDER

RUSTAM S. SIDHWA J.-This is a petition by Shaukat Hayat Khan and others, petitioners, seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench, Abbottabad, dated 13-6-1989.

2. Arguments heard. Leave is granted to consider why the case should not be remanded for the re- hearing of the revision petition by the Peshawar High Court as a partial relief was granted to the respondent-Government in motion proceedings without notice to the petitioners. The petitioners shall furnish security in the sum of Rs.5,000. The appeal shall be heard on the basis of the present record. The parties are at liberty to file such further documents as they consider necessary for the full and final disposal of the appeal.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.