Pakistan Case Law
1975 SCMR 69

HAJI AHMAD vs THE STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1975 SCMR 69
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No, 249 of 1974
Date1974-11-28
Judge(s)Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Abdul Kadir Shaikh
ResultPetition dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition for special leave to appeal arises from the conviction of the petitioner under Section 376 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 for committing rape on his stepdaughter, which was upheld by both the Sessions Judge and the Lahore High Court. The core legal question addressed by the courts was whether the absence of external marks of injury or violence on the person of the prosecutrix falsifies the charge of rape. The Supreme Court held that the lack of external violence does not negate the occurrence of rape, particularly where medical evidence confirms internal trauma and the presence of semen, and the victim was overpowered and rendered helpless through threats. The key principle laid down is that the testimony of a young prosecutrix, when corroborated by medical findings such as vaginal tears and chemical examiner reports confirming semen stains, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for rape even in the absence of bodily injuries.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the absence of external marks of injury or violence on the person of the prosecutrix falsify a charge of rape?
  • Is the testimony of a prosecutrix sufficient to sustain a conviction for rape when supported by medical evidence of internal trauma and semen stains?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 376, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
rapestepdaughtermedical evidencechemical examiner reportspecial leave to appealcredibility of prosecutrix

1. ' ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.-Haji Ahmad son of Qadir Bakhsh, petitioner herein, was convicted by Magistrate, Its Class, Bahawalpur, under section 376, P.P.C. And sentenced to 3i years' R.I, and to pay Rs, 500 in default to further undergo six months' R.I. For having committed rape on his stepdaughter, Mst. Sardar Khatoon, aged 12/13 years, in his own house. The conviction and the sentence have been upheld by the Sessions Judge, Bahawalpur and the Lahore High Court on appeal and revision application by the convict. All the three Courts believed the testimony of the prosecutor which was supported by the medical evidence that she was subjected to rape.

2. In support of this petition for special leave to appeal, learned counsel submitted that the prosecution case stands falsified by the medical evidence which shows that no mark of injury or violence was found on the person of the prosecutrix. We find that learned Single Judge in the High Court has already appreciated this aspect of the case. According to him "this would not imply that she had not been raped by the petitioner. A perusal of the Medico-legal Report Exh. P.D. Clearly reveals that Mst. Sardar Khatoon had been raped. The lady doctor stated that tears on lateral margins bleed on touch. The lady doctor sent vaginal swabs to the Chemical Examiner, who found these stained with semen. The report of Chemical Examiner is Exh. P.C. It is not possible to believe that a young girl 12/13 years of age wanted to falsely implicate her step-father in a case of this type."

3. ' We whole-heartedly agree with these conclusions. According to Mst. Sardar Khatoon, her step- father threatened her with death in case she raised an alarm and committed rape on her after gagging her mouth with a piece of cloth. The prosecutrix, a young girl of 12/13 years, was thus overpowered by the petitioner, her step-father, and she found herself too helpless to offer any resistance. This conclusion finds support from the fact that she was found lying unconscious by her mother Mst. Allah Wasai who returned to the house soon after the occurrence.

4. ' There is no merit in this petition. It is, therefore, dismissed.

Cited by 12 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.