Pakistan Case Law
1994 PLC (C.S.) 296

GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. Through Secretary, Health Department, N.W.F.P., Peshawar And 3 Other vs Haji MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE And Another

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1994 PLC (C.S.) 296
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 131‑P of 1992
Date1993-03-15
Judge(s)Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Wali Muhammad Khan
ResultLeave granted
Summary

The respondent challenged a transfer order issued by the provincial government before the High Court, which set aside the order on the grounds of mala fides, specifically citing the influence of an M.P.A. in the decision-making process. The Government of N.W.F.P. appealed this decision to the Supreme Court. The core legal question presented is whether the High Court possesses the jurisdiction to adjudicate upon service transfer matters, or if such jurisdiction is exclusively vested in the Service Tribunal under the relevant service laws. The appellant argued that the High Court lacked jurisdiction because the matter pertained to the terms and conditions of service, and further contended that transfers made in the exigency of service and public interest are not subject to judicial interference. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to examine the jurisdictional competence of the High Court in service-related transfer disputes and the scope of judicial review regarding administrative transfer orders.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the High Court have jurisdiction to set aside an order of transfer relating to the terms and conditions of service?
  • Is the Service Tribunal the exclusive forum for adjudicating disputes regarding the transfer of civil servants?
  • Can the High Court interfere with a transfer order made in the exigency of service and public interest?
transfer orderservice jurisdictionHigh Court jurisdictionterms and conditions of servicemala fideexigency of service

ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J---The respondent No.1 challenged the order of his transfer in a Constitution petition before the High Court. The High Court accepted the petition on the ground that the order of transfer was mala fide as it was made on the recommendation of an M.PA.

2. The learned Advocate-General submitted that the High Court had no jurisdiction to set aside the order of transfer as it relates to the terms and conditions of service and the Service Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction in the matter and secondly the High Court could not interfere in the order of transfer which is made in the exigency of service and in the public interest.

Leave to appeal is granted.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.