MUHAMMAD BAKHSH Versus AHMAD alias AHMI and 6 others

ORDER

' This is an 4pplication filed by Muhammad Bakhsh, petitioner/complainant, against respondents Nos.1 to 6 for the cancellation of their bail granted by my learned brother Sh. Khizar Hayat, J. (as he then was) on 8-3-1994.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the abovementioned respondents are continuously threatening the petitioner/complainant and other prosecution witnesses after they were allowed to bail that on 17-4-1994 they made threats to the petitioner and other prosecution witnesses of dire consequences if they made statements against them in. The relevant Court; that in consequence of it, the petitioner lodged a report at Police Station Chichawatni and that the abovesaid respondents have misused the concession of bail and their bail, in view of this development, may be cancelled.

3. I have given anxious consideration to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant. Admittedly, affidavits of the witnesses, in whose presence the threats were allegedly made, have not been filed with the present application. It is well-settled that it is hazardous to rely on reports in Roznamcha without actual proof of these facts in Court. (See Abdul Rahim v. The State and others 1987 PCr. U 588. Further, no medical certificate lc has been placed on the file to substantiate the allegation that the petitioner and other prosecution witnesses were injured by the abovesaid respondents.

' For the foregoing reasons, I am not inclined to cancel the bail of the abovementioned respondents and the petition is rejected.