MUHAMMAD IQBAL alias BALA vs THE STATE
The petitioner, Muhammad Iqbal alias Bala, sought relief from the Supreme Court of Pakistan regarding his conviction. The parties involved reached a compromise to settle the matter, the terms of which were formally recorded in a previous court order dated 18-1-1994. The State, represented by counsel, expressed no objection to the compounding of the offence. Consequently, the Supreme Court converted the petition into an appeal and granted permission for the compounding of the offence. The Court held that in light of the compromise between the parties and the lack of objection from the State, the petitioner was entitled to acquittal. Accordingly, the petitioner was acquitted of the charges against him and ordered to be released from custody immediately, provided he was not required in any other legal case. This judgment affirms the principle that where parties have reached a valid compromise in a compoundable offence, the court may allow such compounding, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
- Can a criminal petition be converted into an appeal to facilitate the compounding of an offence?
- Is an accused entitled to acquittal upon the successful compounding of an offence with the consent of the State?
ORDER
1. Parties have compounded the offence. Terms of compromise have been recorded in the Order of the Court dated 18-1-1994.
2. ' Learned counsel for the State has no objection to compounding of offence. Accordingly this petition is converted into appeal and compounding of offence is allowed. The petitioner is acquitted of charges against him. He shall be set at liberty forthwith if not required in any other case.
Cited by 1 case
- Hidayatullah alias Dili Jan and another vs The State 2023 MLD 271