ZAFAR IQBAL vs M.G.O., M.G.O. BRANCH, GHQ RAWALPINDI and 3 others
This petition for leave to appeal was filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, which had dismissed the petitioner's service appeal on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner, despite being senior to the private respondents, was denied promotion by the departmental authority based on unfavorable entries in his Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs). After exhausting departmental remedies, the petitioner sought a direction from the Service Tribunal for his promotion on the basis of seniority. The Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the fitness of a civil servant for promotion. The Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld this decision, ruling that the question of fitness for promotion is expressly barred from the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal under the relevant statutory provisions. Consequently, the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal and dismissed the petition.
- Does the Service Tribunal have jurisdiction to determine the fitness of a civil servant to hold a particular post or be promoted?
- Can a civil servant challenge a denial of promotion based on ACR entries before the Service Tribunal under Section 4(1) of the Service Tribunals Act 1973?
- Whether the statutory bar on promotion-related questions under the Service Tribunals Act 1973 applies when a senior civil servant is bypassed for promotion by a departmental promotion committee?
- Section 4(1), Service Tribunals Act 1973
' SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.---The petitioner is seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 4-5-1994 whereby the service appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed on the ground that the Service Tribunal had no jurisdiction in the matter.
2. The relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner though senior to the private respondents in the petition was denied promotion by the Departmental Authority. After exhausting the departmental remedies the petitioner approached the Service Tribunal with the following prayer:- "It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court may be please to accept the appeal and direct the respondent No, 1 to promote the appellant on the basis of seniority."
The learned Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the petitioner holding that in view of the bar contained in section 4(1) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to go into the question of fitness or otherwise of a civil servant to hold a particular post. It is quite clear from reading of order of the Service Tribunal that the petitioner was denied promotion by the Departmental Promotion Committee on the ground that he was not found fit for promotion on account of certain entries in his ACRs, The question of promotion being excepted from the jurisdiction of the Tribunal under section 4(1) of the Service Tribunal the learned Service Tribunal rightly declined to go into the question raised before it. The petition is accordingly dismissed and leave is refused.
Cited by 14 cases
- Faheemuddin and 5 others vs Province of Sindh and others 2023 SHC 70, 2024 PLC (C.S.) 833
- ABDUL SATTAR JATOI Versus CHIEF MINISTER SINDH through Principal Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat, Karachi 2022 SCMR 550
- ABDUL SATTAR JATOI Versus CHIEF MINISTER SINDH through Principal Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat, Karachi 2022 PLC(CS) 914
- GHULAM ABBAS vs CHIEF SECRETARY and 2 others 2016 PLC ( C.S.) 87
- GHULAM ABBAS Versus CHIEF SECRETARY 2016 PLC(CS) 87
- MUHAMMAD AZAM vs MUHAMMAD TUFAIL and others 2011 SCMR 1871
- MUHAMMAD AZAM vs MUHAMMAD TUFAIL and others 2012 PLC (C.S.) 1104
- BASHIR AHMED NIZAMANI vs GOVERNMENT OF SINDH S&GAD through Chief 2008 PLC (C.S.) 450
- Bashir Ahmed Nizamani vs Government Of SINDH And 5 Other K.L.R. 2008 Labour & Service Cases 94
- HABIB-UR-REHMAN vs THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2001 PLC (C.S.) 949
- ABDUL RASHID LODHI Versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 1999 PLC(CS) 811
- Sh. MUHAMMAD RIAZ vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Communication and Works and another 2003 PLC (C.S.) 1496
- Abdul Sattar Jatoi vs Chief Minister Sindh through Principal Secretary, Chief 2022 PLJ SC 129
- Abdul Sattar Jatoi vs Chief Minister Sindh through Principal Secretary, Chief 2023 PSC 86