Pakistan Case Law
1996 SCMR 1116

AHMED JAWAD SARWAR vs Mst. ZENIA

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1996 SCMR 1116
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No, 303/L of 1994
Date1994-10-18
Judge(s)Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and Muhammad Munir Khan
Authored byMuhammad Rafiq Tarar
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan concerning the custody of a minor. The core legal question is whether section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 was rightly invoked to hand over custody of the minor to the mother in the absence of any observation or material indicating she had been illegally deprived of such custody. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to consider this question and modified the interim arrangement ordered by the High Court to permit the grandfather and grandmother, along with the father, to visit the minor. The principle laid down involves the proper scope and invocation of habeas corpus jurisdiction under section 491 in minor custody matters where illegal deprivation must be examined.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 can be invoked for handing over the custody of a minor in the absence of material indicating illegal deprivation?
  • Can the Supreme Court modify an interim custody arrangement passed by the High Court pending appeal?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 491, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
minor custodyhabeas corpusleave to appealinterim arrangementguardianship

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.---Leave to appeal is granted to .Consider inter alia whether in the absence of any observation/material indicating that the respondent (mother) had been illegally deprived of the custody of the minor, section 491 of the Cr.P.C. Was rightly invoked for handing over the custody to the mother ' Interim arrangement as ordered by the High Court is modified to the extent that the grandfather and grandmother will also be permitted to seek the minor along with the father.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.