HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD. and anothers vs GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others
The petitioners, Habib Sugar Mills Limited and Balochistan Particle Board Limited, sought leave to appeal against a common judgment of the Sindh High Court dismissing their constitutional petitions challenging the levy and collection of export tax/duty on the movement of sugar, bagasse, and methanol from the Province of Sindh to other provinces. The core legal question was whether the levy of export tax on goods moved inter-provincially infringes Article 151 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, especially given conflicting views of the High Court and prior pronouncements of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that the petition raised a point of public importance involving conflicting High Court views and prior Supreme Court endorsements, thus warranting deeper consideration. Consequently, the Court granted leave to appeal, directed the maintenance of records for exported material, restrained authorities from charging the export tax in the interim, and stipulated that tax along with mark-up would be payable if the appeals were ultimately dismissed. The key principle laid down is that inter-provincial trade restrictions and taxation issues presenting conflicting High Court interpretations require authoritative examination by the apex court under Article 151.
- Does the levy and collection of export tax on goods moved from one province to another infringe Article 151 of the Constitution of Pakistan?
- Whether conflicting views of the High Court regarding inter-provincial export taxation warrant the grant of leave to appeal by the Supreme Court?
- Article 151, Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
ORDER
' MIR HAZAR KHAN KHOSO, J.---Petitioners M/s. Habib Sugar Mills Limited (C.P. No, 350-K of 1994) and Balochistan Particle Board Limited (C.P. No, 351/94) seek leave to appeal against a common judgment dated 26-10-1994 passed by a Division Bench of High Court of Sindh, Karachi, whereby C.P. No, D-142/90 and C.P.No,D-18/91 filed by them were dismissed. In C.P. No, D-142 of 1990 M/s. Habib Sugar Mills Limited had challenged the authority of respondents levying and collecting tax on export of sugar, bagasse's etc: from their mill situated in District Nawabshah (Sindh) to the Province of Punjab.
2. In C.P. No,18/91 petitioner Baluchistan Particle Board Limited, had challenged notification of the respondents declaring Methanol as alcohol and also levying and collection of export tax on its movement from Karachi (Sindh) to Hub, the Province of Baluchistan. In both the petitions the Division Bench held that levy and collection of. Export duty on Methanol and sugar or products thereof was not infringement of Article 151 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
3. Mr. Muhammad Ali Sayeed; the learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently contended that the High Court did not properly interpret the Article 151 of the Constitution. The learned counsel further contended that in C.P. No,D-722 of 1990, CP. No, D-1089/92 and C.P. No,D-2875/92 a Division Bench of the High Court by judgment dated 3-5-1993 held that no excise duty could be levied and collected When Methanol was moved from one Province to another Province under Article 151 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Reliance in that case was placed on the cases reported in 1990 M LD 317 and PLD 1990 Karachi 40.
4. The learned counsel further submitted that vide judgment dated 28-9-1989 the High Court of Sindh in C.Ps. Nos. D-113/86, D-523/85, D-292/86, D-267/83, and D-472/90 had declared that demand of export tax on the goods which were intended to be dispatched outside Province of Sindh to other Provinces was infringement of Article 151 of the Constitution.
5. The learned counsel argued that in Civil Appeals Nos. 513-K of 1990, 514-K of 1990, 693-K of 1990, 53-K of 1991 and 69-K of 1991, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the view taken by the High Court of Sindh. In such view of the matter the learned counsel submitted that on the proposition there are conflicting views of the High Court but its earlier view is upheld by the Supreme Court. This Court, therefore, should examine whether the respondents are barred under Article 151 of the Constitution to levy tax on import of goods from the Province of Sindh to the Provinces of Punjab and Baluchistan. The point is of public importance and needs consideration by this Court. We are, therefore, inclined to grant leave to appeal in both the petitions. Let the appeals be fixed for regular hearing within three months with consent of the learned counsel for the parties. In the meantime the petitioners and the concerned authorities shall keep record of the export of the material from Province of Sindh to other Provinces, but the authorities shall not charge the same. In case the appeals are dismissed they shall pay the export tax along with mark-up chargeable at the rate of Khas Deposit Certificates.
Cited by 1 case
- PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD. and others vs GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. 2002 PLD Supreme Court 460