MUHAMMAD IRSHAD Alias SHADA vs The STATE
The petitioner, Muhammad Irshad alias Shada, was convicted under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 for the murder of a six-year-old child and sentenced to death by the trial court, which conviction and sentence were subsequently upheld by the Lahore High Court. The petitioner filed a jail petition for leave to appeal, which was barred by 17 days. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached a compromise, and a compromise pro forma was verified by the Sessions Judge, confirming that the legal heirs—the father and mother of the deceased—had waived their right of Qisas. The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the petition due to the compromise, converted the petition into an appeal, and examined the matter. Holding that a genuine composition of an offence under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 by the legal heirs results in the acquittal of the accused, the Court allowed the appeal and ordered the immediate release of the petitioner.
- Does a compromise between the legal heirs and the accused regarding an offence under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 result in the acquittal of the accused?
- Can delay in filing a petition for leave to appeal be condoned in view of a compromise between the parties?
- What is the legal effect of the waiver of the right of Qisas by the legal heirs of a deceased victim?
- Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
ORDER
MUHAMMAD MUNIR KHAN, J.---Muhmmad Irshad alias Shada petitioner was tried by Additional Sessions Judge, Bahawalpur under section 302, P.P.C. For the murder of Zafar Abbas aged six years, who, on the conclusion of the trial vide judgment dated 18-11-1992 convicted him and sentenced him to death and a fine of Rs.50,000 or three years' R.I. In default. The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the sentence of death was confirmed by the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, on 21-5-1995. Feeling aggrieved thereby the petitioner filed petition for leave to appeal through jail which was barred by 17 days. As the petition involved sentence of death, so Mr. Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate, Supreme Court was nominated as a counsel for the petitioner at State expenses. During the pendency of the petition for leave to appeal, the parties compromised. The Compromise Pro forma was filed in the Jail petition for leave to appeal which was forwarded to the learned Sessions Judge Bahawalpur for verification, who, after recording the statement of Attaullah, the father and Mst. Nasim Bibi, the mother of the deceased, has reported that the legal heirs have waived their right of Qisas and compromised with the petitioner/accused.
2. In view of the compromise between the parties, delay of 17 days in filing the petition is condoned.
3. Father and the mother of the deceased are present in Court. They own I compromise and state to have waived their right of Qisas. We are convinced that the compromise between the legal heirs of the deceased and the petitioner accused is genuine. The composition of an offence under section 302, P.P.C by the legal heirs of the deceased shall have the effect of acquittal of the accused with whom the offence has been compounded.
4. Resultantly, the petition is converted into appeal and allowed. The petitioner shall be released forthwith if not required to be detained in any other case.
Cited by 2 cases
- MANZOOR AHMED and another vs 2ND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE GHOTKI 2012 PLD Sindh 35
- RAHIM BAKHSH vs THE STATE 2000 MLD 1928